What is difference (technical,main purpose,mechanical properties etc) between tempering effects after quenching and tempering effects after normalizing?
Re: Tempering Effects After Quenching and Normalizing
07/06/2010 2:41 PM
Actually, the Wikipedia article is Dangerously in Error. Consider this particular "statement"
"The martensite becomes strong after being tempered because when reheated, the microstructure can rearrange and the carbon atoms can diffuse out of the distorted body-centred-tetragonal (BCT) structure. After the carbon diffuses, the result is nearly pure ferrite with body-centred structure."
Tempering martensite produces pure ferrite? HUH? Or does it mean tempered martensite is pure ferrite? The martensite already is a Body centered structure (albeit tetragonal) What the hell do they mean here? Where do the carbon atoms go? Boil off to Al Gore's greenhouse gas love shack so they can hook up with Oxygen?? So does tempering reduce the wt % of carbon in the steel? Even in the center of mass? If not how does the center relax if the carbon atoms are still there?
Tempering is a low temperature themal treatment, always below the lower critical point of steel that is employed to reduce the stress in a steel material. By this definition, tempering cannot result in "recrystallization to ferrite" as the WIKI article seems to state.
By heating steel below the lower critical point A1, Tempering relieves stresses that were induced by quenching, cooling, and reduces hardness and brittleness, without allowing the material to recrystallize.
In quench and tempered material, the untempered martensite is very brittle because the transformation from Austenite (Face Centered Cubic- Close Packed) to martensite creates a Body Centered Tetragonal structure which is not close packed. The creation of martensite expands the structure, since the unit volume per atom of iron in FCC is less than that in BCT.
Because the martensite phase expands on quenching oriented randomly in the prior austenite, it puts all material around it in compression, adding stress to the lattice. This stress inherent in the metal makes it unusably brittle. Adding heat to steel results in three things in this order:
Relaxation.
Recrystallization.
Grain Growth.
The added energy provided by the temper allows the material to relax by allowing some of the martensite's volumetric stresses to slip or relax, this reduces the volume of the martensite as it is tempered. This results in less brittleness and so greater toughness ( TOUGHNESS which for now I will call the area under the stress strain curve.) Note, no carbon is lost by this process, unlike the WIKI claim.
Once the material has been heated such that all stresses have been relaxed, the material can then recrystallize. If held at a high enough temperature for a long enough time, those new grains will grow, coalescing into their neighbors.
Normalizing of steels was more prevalent in the days of ingot casting, when there was greater segregtaion of and less control of as cast structures than on todays modern continuous casters. By heating some temperature above A3, (usually 50 degrees F above that point) and then letting the material slow cool in still air, the effects of this microstructural segregation could be minimized. But because these steels had high hardenability, it was possible to have a small amount of hardness even following this normalizing procedure. Thus the temper to assure that the material was as stress free as possible.
Relaxation. Recrystallization. Grain growth.
In that order.
Better leave the Wiki piece alone, it uses lots of terms, but not in a coherent and understandable way, that conforms to the process.
Milo
__________________
People say between two opposed opinions the truth lies in the middle. Not at all! Between them lies the problem, what is unseeable,eternally active life, contemplated in repose. Goethe
Re: Tempering Effects After Quenching and Normalizing
07/07/2010 9:22 AM
You're welcome. It was a practical question.
Milo
__________________
People say between two opposed opinions the truth lies in the middle. Not at all! Between them lies the problem, what is unseeable,eternally active life, contemplated in repose. Goethe
Good Answers: