Previous in Forum: 'U' Stamp Supplier Reg:   Next in Forum: Welding Across the Chord of a Beam
Close
Close
Close
3 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Participant

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1

mechanical material science discussion

08/06/2010 7:31 AM

what is the difference between ss316 and ss316L material

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Anonymous Poster
#1

Re: mechanical material science discussion

08/06/2010 8:41 AM

Chemical- 'L' Denotes lower carbon content.

Mechanical- almost same

Other : Lower carbon content of 'L' reduces the sensitization of the metal (ie reduces Cr3C2 formation) and thus reduces the grain boundary corrossion in case the metal is heated to high temperature (as may occur during welding or annealing)

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member Egypt - Member - Member since 02/18/2007

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Posts: 1733
Good Answers: 248
#2

Re: mechanical material science discussion

08/07/2010 1:43 AM

Free download this file Stainless_Steel_Grade_Selection issued by Atlas Speciality Metals, and see page 7 of 10:

......................

__________________
It is better to be defeated on principles, than to win on lies!
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Active Contributor

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 11
#3

Re: mechanical material science discussion

08/08/2010 1:59 PM

Type 316 austenitic stainless steel is a commonly used alloy for products that require excellent

overall corrosion resistance. Type 316L is a low-carbon modification of Type 316. The following is

a comparison of these alloys.

The maximum carbon content in Type 316 is 0.08%. The carbon content is controlled to a

maximum of 0.03% in 316L, which minimizes the problem of carbide precipitation during the

welding process. If austenitic stainless steels are welded at a high temperature, carbon can combine

with the chromium to form chromium carbide in the heat affected zone of the weld. The loss of

chromium in the alloy can cause a reduction in the corrosion resistance of the alloy in that area.

Carbide precipitation can be prevented by closely controlling the welding temperature or by

solution annealing the parts after welding. Where that is not practical the use of a low carbon alloy

reduces the possibility of carbide precipitation.

Except for the improved weldability of the alloy, 316L has similar corrosion resistance and

mechanical properties to 316. The exception is that the tensile yield strength of 316L is somewhat

less than that of 316 at ambient temperatures. In the ASME Pressure Vessel Code the maximum

allowable stress for 316 is 20,000 psi, but it is only 16,700 psi for 316L.

The cast equivalents of these alloys are CF8M (316) and CF3M (316L). In the cast alloys the

reason for the reduced carbon is the same as for the wrought alloys. The corrosion resistance and

mechanical properties of these two alloys are the same. The Pressure Vessel Code gives a maximum

allowable stress of 20,000 psi for each of the cast alloys.

Another difference in the Pressure Vessel Code is that 316 and CF8M may be used at

temperatures up to 1500F, whereas the 316L and CF3M alloys are limited to a maximum

temperature of 800F. This is generally not a consideration for Sartell Valves & Controls products.

A similar comparison can be made between the standard and low carbon versions of other

austenitic stainless steel alloys. For example: between 304 (CF8) and 304L (CF3) and between 317

(CG8M) and 317L (CG3M).

Conclusions

:

Use the standard austenitic alloys (316 or CF8M) whenever the part will not be welded or can be

solution annealed after welding.

Use the low carbon versions (316L or CF3M) for parts that will be welded and cannot be solution

annealed after welding.

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 3 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Abdel Halim Galala (1); Anonymous Poster (1); mbaz_81 (1)

Previous in Forum: 'U' Stamp Supplier Reg:   Next in Forum: Welding Across the Chord of a Beam

Advertisement