Previous in Forum: Pollution Control in Automobile Industry   Next in Forum: Laser For Ionizing Water?
Close
Close
Close
6 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Participant

Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3

Coal in Transfer Chutes Tubular vs. Square

09/28/2010 5:55 AM

Wear characteristics of Coal in Transfer Chutes Tubular vs Square.

Would 800 tph of coal wear the chute material sooner in a small diameter(ex.28" Dia) or large diameter (ex.36" Dia)

__________________
Karl M Williamson
Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 529
Good Answers: 15
#1

Re: Manufacturing Coordinator

09/28/2010 7:15 AM

One advantage of using a square or rectangular chute is that abrasion resistant liners can be bolted to a flat surface.

What size is the coal? 6" max, 12" max or ?

Is the chute vertical or at a slope?

Are you worried about the chute plugging up? If so, bigger is better as long as the slope stays the same.

__________________
downhill slide to 112 (damn memor.)
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Participant

Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Manufacturing Coordinator

09/28/2010 11:21 AM

3/4" Minus Coal after the crusher, dropping 15 Ft. Fabricated with CCO Overlay Plate.

19" Diameter. Severe Wear at Belt Conveyor Load Chute. 800 TPH 50lbs Cu Ft.

Applachian Coal.

__________________
Karl M Williamson
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 529
Good Answers: 15
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Manufacturing Coordinator

09/28/2010 11:31 AM

Thanks for the info. I don't think I can offer any more help.

I used to work 20+ years ago for a company that made coal sampling systems. The tonnage on those chutes was way less than what you're seeing.

Has your local steel supplier offered any ideas?

__________________
downhill slide to 112 (damn memor.)
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Izmir, Turkey
Posts: 2142
Good Answers: 31
#4
In reply to #2

Re: Manufacturing Coordinator

09/28/2010 1:38 PM

Are you worried about damage to the coal? Fines or smaller size generation?

Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Manufacturing Coordinator

09/28/2010 3:03 PM

No, not worried about damage to the coal. Worried about wear abrasion and flow volume through small diameter.

__________________
Karl M Williamson
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Large hole formally occupied by furry woodland creature.
Posts: 3385
Good Answers: 97
#6

Re: Coal in Transfer Chutes Tubular vs. Square

09/28/2010 4:44 PM

Something to consider:

After replacing numerous sweeps made of carbon steel for a pneumatic conveyor system we were approached by a rep for a major rubber company, who recommended heavy walled transfer hose. This hose outlasted the metal by a great margin. This high wear resistance had to do with impingement factors. The only negative was that the hose had to be grounded due to the static generated.

__________________
CRTL-Z
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 6 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

ddk (2); Karl Williamson (2); russ123 (1); Unredundant (1)

Previous in Forum: Pollution Control in Automobile Industry   Next in Forum: Laser For Ionizing Water?
You might be interested in: Tubular Heaters, Wear Strips, Plates and Parts

Advertisement