Previous in Forum: Protection Relay Earthing in Power System   Next in Forum: 2 IC:1BC PCC
Close
Close
Close
12 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Member

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: New Delhi India
Posts: 8

Contactor Not Getting Dropoff for Long Distance Cable Due to Cable Capitance.

11/09/2010 3:07 AM

I had experienced several times the problem of Contactor not getting dropoff for long distance cable due to Cable capitance. "e.g LCS is placed 1 KM away from MCC Motor feeder & Operator want to stop the Motor by pressing STOP Push Button & Motor is not getting STOP".

I had done many experiment like shorting the spare core & earth it with Armour. (Not Adequate)

Using 2 NC Stop Push button at LCS & when Stop is pressed entire core to contactor is earth (Work below 500Mtrs).

Third Method I had used is Connecting a capacitor between A1(Phase to Contactor Coil) & earth. Capacitor value depends on Length of cable ,no of core etc works fine for any length of cable.

Am looking for more solutions on same.

__________________
Rajesh Sharma
Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
India - Member - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Temporarily at Ashburn, VA
Posts: 2744
Good Answers: 164
#1

Re: Contactor not getting dropoff for long distance cable due to Cable capitance.

11/09/2010 3:39 AM

Check out this link : moeller

__________________
Nothing worthwhile can ever be taught, it can only be learnt.
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: New Delhi India
Posts: 8
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Contactor not getting dropoff for long distance cable due to Cable capitance.

11/09/2010 3:50 AM

Dear Sridhar,

I had already gone thru Moeller litrature & based on same I had calculate Coupling Cap.

__________________
Rajesh Sharma
Register to Reply
Guru
India - Member - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Temporarily at Ashburn, VA
Posts: 2744
Good Answers: 164
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Contactor not getting dropoff for long distance cable due to Cable capitance.

11/09/2010 4:04 AM

Ah, sorry, i didn't know. Anyway, my preference would be to use DC coils... easier now since most good companies are offering electronically controlled contactors, fom50A(AC3) onwards ...

__________________
Nothing worthwhile can ever be taught, it can only be learnt.
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: New Delhi India
Posts: 8
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Contactor not getting dropoff for long distance cable due to Cable capitance.

11/09/2010 4:17 AM

Dear Sridhar,

Thanks for your suggestion, but as you know using AC as control supply is totally customer/consultant choice. As a design engineer we can suggest but final descion is of customer/consultant . I normally suggest adding capacitor & it works fine. Am looking for any new idea /sugesstion for above problem.

Thanks

__________________
Rajesh Sharma
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1294
Good Answers: 35
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Contactor not getting dropoff for long distance cable due to Cable capitance.

11/09/2010 7:35 AM

In our mining applications (emergency and normal stops on long conveyors), we used DC. Most of the control was AC, and the details on what we did are a little hazy, but we converted the minimum amount of the circuit to DC by installing a full wave rectifier to send DC through the stop circuit, and, typically, used an auxillary control relay at the motor starter to accept the DC and open the circuit to the motor starter coil.

(Actually, these were always field changes to a variety of manufacturer's equipment, so we looked for the easiest ways to accomplish this based on the design of the control circuit.)

This was all 30+ years ago. If anyone had been resistant to using DC instead of AC for the control circuit, I would have told them that the control circuit was AC, but we had to make special provisions (a "long distance stop circuit" ;-) for long conveyors and such.

Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: New Delhi India
Posts: 8
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Contactor not getting dropoff for long distance cable due to Cable capitance.

11/09/2010 7:43 AM

Thanks all friends, Am aware that using DC in this type of application is fine, but am looking more solution in AC only.

__________________
Rajesh Sharma
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1294
Good Answers: 35
#10
In reply to #5

Re: Contactor not getting dropoff for long distance cable due to Cable capitance.

11/10/2010 10:23 AM

Just looking back at what I wrote, maybe the last paragraph is a little ambiguous--today I would change the "was" to "is" and make it read as follows:

"This was all 30+ years ago. If anyone had been resistant to using DC instead of AC for the control circuit, I would have told them that the control circuit is AC, but we had to make special provisions (a "long distance stop circuit" ;-) for long conveyors and such."

Also, just to be clear, that added relay was (is ;-) wired into the circuit so that loss of signal stops the conveyor (and all are control was 3-wire control).

Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1604
Good Answers: 63
#7

Re: Contactor Not Getting Dropoff for Long Distance Cable Due to Cable Capitance.

11/09/2010 1:53 PM

I found two possible pieces of info

1. http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=217821

2. From another site

I have received a number of emails from folk who have found AC driven relays remaining closed when using a long control cable. Although not in itself a power quality problem, I've seen the most amazing answers on 'help' forums (even to the point of blaming harmonics!), so I though I would add it in here. I must admit I do have a hard time believing the cable could have sufficient capacitance so as to hold an AC relay closed, there is also the possibility the cable may be waterlogged thus lowering the impedance even further. One could put a resistor in parallel with the relay coil in the hope of increasing the loading on the control circuit and therefore reduce the effect of the cable capacitance. This is not a bad idea, but the resistor has a by-product of generating heat - a much undesired effect. This method also carries a danger in that should the resistor burn out the controlled circuit will again remain energised. The first and simplest cure is to connect a capacitor in parallel with the relay coil. The control cable capacitance and coil capacitor will act as a capacitive voltage divider. If the 'loading' capacitor is large enough then the resultant voltage across the relay coil will be low when the control cable is open circuit. A few microfarads should be all that is required (a power factor correction capacitor from a small fluorescent lamp should do the trick). The second and better cure is to move the control voltage to the control side of the cable i.e. feed a voltage down the cable to the relay, and not use the cable to remotely interrupt the voltage to the relay coil. It must be remembered that AC is the problem here. There is one other danger in that should the cable become water-logged (thus lowering the resistance of the cable significantly) you land up back where you started being the controlled circuit remaining energised with the first cure, or possibly blowing fuses with the second.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2061
Good Answers: 169
#8

Re: Contactor Not Getting Dropoff for Long Distance Cable Due to Cable Capitance.

11/10/2010 9:13 AM

Can you inform me your mail ID thro this forum's mailbox so that I can send you some interesting articles on the subject? The articles are too large to copy & paste directly.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1294
Good Answers: 35
#9
In reply to #8

Re: Contactor Not Getting Dropoff for Long Distance Cable Due to Cable Capitance.

11/10/2010 10:19 AM

Can you provide links or citations to those articles, as I (and maybe others) are interested as well.

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 134
Good Answers: 11
#11

Re: Contactor Not Getting Dropoff for Long Distance Cable Due to Cable Capitance.

11/10/2010 12:20 PM

Are you using a solid state relay?

Solid state relays (optically coupled) will sometimes pick up enough AC voltage to stay closed. This can be prevented by placing a resistor in parallel with the input to the relay.

I would be uneasy with using a solid state relay in this application.

Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: New Delhi India
Posts: 8
#12
In reply to #11

Re: Contactor Not Getting Dropoff for Long Distance Cable Due to Cable Capitance.

11/11/2010 3:21 AM

We use SEL which is having inbuild debouncing time feature. Please note Most of scheme We use contactor for interposing. It accept command from LCS. I know the problem ,I have working solutions. Am looking for new solutions in AC systems along with contactor to eliminate cable capitance voltage.

Thanks for your valuable feedbacks.

Regards

__________________
Rajesh Sharma
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 12 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Carl Pugh (1); electricalexpert65 (1); kvsridhar (2); raj151857 (4); rhkramer (3); wareagle (1)

Previous in Forum: Protection Relay Earthing in Power System   Next in Forum: 2 IC:1BC PCC
You might be interested in: Cable Laying Services, Cable Assemblies, Cable Trays

Advertisement