Previous in Forum: Epoxy Floor Coatings   Next in Forum: Concenration of Cons Acids
Close
Close
Close
5 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Anonymous Poster

Neccessity of Pneumatic Hold Test & Cold Test for Air Separation Unit

11/18/2010 6:31 AM

Pneumatic strength test of newly erected Air Separation Unit piping (including piping & distillation columns in the cold box) are being carried out as per ASME B 31.3.

Is the following tests absolutely necessary for such plants?

1. Pneumatic hold test at operating pressure for 12 hours.

2. Cold Test (piping & distillation columns in the cold box is subjected to cryogenic temperature by starting the unit without insulation until sufficient cryogenic liquid is formed & threafter warmed-up and leak tested again).

Supplier is arguing that these tests are not required as they do not do for their other clients.

Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Anonymous Poster
#1

Re: Neccessity of Pneumatic Hold Test & Cold Test for Air Separation Unit

11/18/2010 7:30 AM

The testing specifications developed for this client trump those provided for some other client at some other plant.

How much of a credit is the supplier offering the Owner in lieu of testing?

Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 80
Good Answers: 8
#2

Re: Necessity of Pneumatic Hold Test & Cold Test for Air Separation Unit

11/19/2010 9:33 AM

My advice, stick to your guns if you think it is a worthwhile test. The testing protocol was established for a reason.

Most likely all of the piping that you are requested to be tested is "owned" by the supplier and, as such, the supplier would be responsible for fixing any problems or failures that would occur with such piping. But, here is where you need to be very careful and make sure you understand your contract, make sure the supplier ensures that if such a failure were to occur that they will be responsible for supplying you with liquefied gas at no additional cost to you until the problem is resolved. This, of course, assumes that if such a failure were to occur, supplemental liquid feed is available such that gas to your process would not be interrupted by a failure of the liquid make plant.

You will pay about 10 x the cost for bulk liquid delivered gas as you would for gas produced by a liquid make plant. Make sure that they are on the hook for the cost of the liquid gas that would be required to supplemented during an outage of the liquid make plant due to such a failure. Also, be aware of any "back door" clauses that allow them a defined number of hours of downtime on their system for which you would be required to provide/pay for the cost of bulk liquid. Every gas contract has some allowance - but you shouldn't have to pay for ANY liquid for a failure of this type if they are refusing to perform the test.

I would throw this one right back to them by saying, if you refuse to perform this testing, which was establish for a good reason (to ensure the reliability of the plant operation) you then assume ALL LIABILITY if such a failure were to occur and you will not be allowed to deduct outage hours of the plant for this type of failure from your allowance in the contract. That will probably change their tune and they may even decide that the test is a good one to perform after all.

Its all about the Benjamins.

__________________
Some standards are like the North Pole and some are like Mecca. People use both to get their sense of direction, however, only one is a preferred destination. - P.E. Scheibmeir
Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Anonymous Poster
#3

Re: Neccessity of Pneumatic Hold Test & Cold Test for Air Separation Unit

11/19/2010 9:43 AM

The supplier is, of course, correct. These tests are not necessary.

If the supplier does not normally provide these for other clients, this is just a waste of time and money.

Pay no attention to what rules are contained in ASME B31.3.

Tell everyone that you received detailed guideance from a Guest post in CR4 and that is certainly good enough for you.

Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 80
Good Answers: 8
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Neccessity of Pneumatic Hold Test & Cold Test for Air Separation Unit

11/19/2010 9:58 AM

Who do you work for?

Air Liquide?

Praxair?

?

__________________
Some standards are like the North Pole and some are like Mecca. People use both to get their sense of direction, however, only one is a preferred destination. - P.E. Scheibmeir
Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member India - Member - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: City of destiny, INDIA
Posts: 775
Good Answers: 67
#5
In reply to #3

Re: Neccessity of Pneumatic Hold Test & Cold Test for Air Separation Unit

11/22/2010 3:59 AM

Thanks for your blunt reply but it is certainly not good enough for me to tell everyone that I have received detailed guideance from (an unknown) Guest post in CR4. What I need is technogical guidance with the support of some relevant standards/codes.

Your statement "Pay no attention to what rules are contained in ASME B31.3" appears to be not in good test for engineering fraternity. After all these codes are made for our guidance.

Reply
Reply to Forum Thread 5 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (2); MrGeneRall (2); pritam (1)

Previous in Forum: Epoxy Floor Coatings   Next in Forum: Concenration of Cons Acids

Advertisement