Previous in Forum: Power Loss in Light Intensity in Water   Next in Forum: AC or DC Motor?
Close
Close
Close
4 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Participant

Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4

Correlation between Ingress protection & Explosion protection

03/28/2007 10:14 PM

Hi friends,

I would like to know about the correlation between Ingress Protection (IP) & Explosion protection (Hazardous ara classification). If there is a Ex certified equipment, is there any minimum requirement on its IP rating (though IP rating depends on exposure to ingress of water/liquid & solid items)?

For example, what is the minimum IP rating required for Ex d certified eqipment? Is there any such correlation? If yes, what about minimum IP rating requirements for Ex e, Ex de, Ex ia, Ex ib, Ex p, Ex o, Ex n....certified equipment? If no, (i.e. IP & Ex protections are independent), please explain me.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
New Zealand - Member - Kiwi Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 8777
Good Answers: 376
#1

Re: Correlation between Ingress protection & Explosion protection

03/28/2007 11:48 PM

The correlation is a little more complicated than you first might expect. For example flameproof (Ex d) enclosures are not necessarily weatherproof (especially if they use a flush metal on metal seal for the lid and are mounted horizontally).

Generally you need to consider Ex and IP ratings separately (or more importantly Ex classification first, then weatherproofness (is that a word) second), however as a general rule Ex rated enclosures will have an equivalent dust rating (by general inspection using common sense) of either IP5X or IP6X and a water rating of IPX4 (or better), but this is only due to the way the Ex enclosures are constructed (using the different techniques to provide protection) to comply in the hazardous areas they are designed for.

In the end it really depends on the type of protection method the Ex enclosure uses (eg-pressurisation, oil immersion, etc), the application it is used in, and the area it is installed in.

Oh, as a side note, I am in the process of becoming certified to sign off on hazardous area equipment and installations as part of my job and my office is currently full of IEC hazardous area standards.

__________________
jack of all trades
Register to Reply
Guru
Belgium - Member - New Member APIX Pilot Plant Design Project - Member - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Glabbeek, Belgium
Posts: 1480
Good Answers: 28
#2

Re: Correlation between Ingress protection & Explosion protection

03/30/2007 3:50 AM

Mani,

Jack is right: there is no relation between IP classification and EX.

If you would dive into the final solutions you will find a strong correlation between EX and IP (this direction). You will see that EX e junction boxes have a minimal protection of IP56. This is imposed by the regulations for EX.

EX d does not comply to this: it is even worse as each d style enclosure has a predefined pressure relief path which prevents water tightness.

One rule of thumb: you can't take a box IP xx and assume that it will comply to a certain EX level as the IP is realised on the level of enclosure and EX is realised inside the enclosure. (d is the exception)

Ask specialists to help you out, instead of defining a wheel. IEC is a good base standard.

Gwen

__________________
"Here we are now, entertain us"
Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wales UK. Tel. +44(0)1446 741180
Posts: 72
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Correlation between Ingress protection & Explosion protection

04/11/2007 9:45 AM

Explosion proof types have to contain and slowly release an internal explosion event while cooling exhausted gases over a flamepath (heatsink), This requires a certain controlled gap in the cover to exhaust any built up pressure within enclosure.

__________________
INDI-LINK makes 'Light' of 'Current' events, a veritable window into wiring.
Register to Reply
Guru
Belgium - Member - New Member APIX Pilot Plant Design Project - Member - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Glabbeek, Belgium
Posts: 1480
Good Answers: 28
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Correlation between Ingress protection & Explosion protection

04/13/2007 10:49 AM

This is the d style of protection.

Modern world has passed this stadium: we don't have explosions any more. (e style)

__________________
"Here we are now, entertain us"
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 4 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

docrobgar (1); Gwen.Stouthuysen (2); jack of all trades (1)

Previous in Forum: Power Loss in Light Intensity in Water   Next in Forum: AC or DC Motor?
You might be interested in: IP Cores, NEMA and IP Enclosures, VoIP and IP Telephony

Advertisement