Previous in Forum: Cable Size Identification   Next in Forum: Electrical Protection
Close
Close
Close
7 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Member

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 9

Single Core Cables

03/15/2012 4:19 AM

1- Why are single core cables laid in trefoil formation, although when I checked cables current carrying capacity of trefoil and flat formation, flat formation was higher?

2-Why in single core cable there is sheath current, and what is bonding from on end and both end?

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Commissariat de Police, Nouvions, occupied France, 1942.
Posts: 2599
Good Answers: 77
#1

Re: Cables

03/15/2012 4:33 AM

A1: heat dissipation is greater in flat formation, therefore current carrying capacity is greater.

__________________
Good moaning!
Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 29
Good Answers: 1
#2

Re: Cables

03/15/2012 4:38 AM
Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Resting under the Major Oak
Posts: 4347
Good Answers: 181
#3

Re: Single Core Cables

03/15/2012 2:01 PM

Tri-foil limits magnetic interference but has the disadvantage of lower current.

Aluminium armouring is bonded at one end only to provide earthing but at the same time prevent circulating currents which would occur if both ends were bonded.

__________________
The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated.
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Power-User

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 403
Good Answers: 5
#4

Re: Single Core Cables

03/16/2012 1:40 AM

Hi

The reason that single core cables are laid in trefoil formation is to reduce the effects of harmonics that happen in this modern age, due to switch mode power supplies and VSD's.

If supplies with harmonic issues are not laid in trefoil formation the voltage drop across the cable and also has effects on the neutral current, check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonics_(electrical_power)

Cheers

Joe

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2061
Good Answers: 169
#5

Re: Single Core Cables

03/20/2012 11:14 AM

1. In multicore cables, the resultant magnetic field around the cable is nullified as it will be the vector sum of the phase(s) current and the neutral current. As such there would not be any induced emf on to the cable armour. Whereas in single-core cables there is a possibility of such induced emf on to the cable armour which could circulate currents thro the armour and thus cause additional heating in the armour & hence premature failure of the cable. One of the ways to avoid the emf induction, is to lay the single core cables in trefoil formation.

2. In single core cable, there is sheath current as explained above.

3. Bonding the armour/sheath at both ends would cause circulating currents (if the single core cables are laid in a non-trefoil formation)

Bonding the armour at one end, would definitely avoid circulating current, bute there could be dangerous touch voltages developed in the shetah, which could harm anybody coming in contact with the same.

Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 9
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Single Core Cables

04/02/2012 2:38 AM

please elaborate to me the difference between multicore cable and 3-single core cables (forming 3 phase) in the resultant field ?

why do you say that multicore cable resultant field will have zero resultant field,while 3-single core cable resultant field isn't zero,althought the sum the 3 phase current in both cases is zero so there should'nt be resultant field

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2061
Good Answers: 169
#7
In reply to #6

Re: Single Core Cables

04/02/2012 9:52 AM

Well! You need some basic training in flux linkages. In muli-core cables, the cores are laid in trefoil form. As such, the flux linkages between the circumferential flux generated due to the current flowing in each core with respect to the cable armour of the other cores would be radial (i.e.) at 90 degrees. Hence, no emf will be induced in the armour due to this circumferential flux. This is also true in three single core cables laid in trefoil formation externally. Whereas, in single core cables laid in falt formation, the flux linkages will be axial and hence there would be induced emf in the armour.

Hope this is clear now!

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 7 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

A.Kassem (1); abele (1); Crabtree (1); electricalexpert65 (2); Joe Sparky (1); TonyS (1)

Previous in Forum: Cable Size Identification   Next in Forum: Electrical Protection

Advertisement