Minimum Thikness Requirement to Check UT Lamination of Tubular Pipe
12/12/2013 4:08 AM
what is the Minimum thikness requirement to check UT lamination of Tubular Pipe.In A578 it is mentioned as 12.5 mm and A435 it is 10 mm.our vendor says he will check only for thik above 25 mm.Kindly advice...
Re: Minimum thikness requirement to check UT lamination of Tubular Pipe
12/13/2013 5:35 AM
Do you have a citation or the source URL for that? Please.
I've encountered lamination /porosity in plate but never in a pipe (lucky perhaps). Normally discovered when the plate having been rolled into a cylinder and made into a fuel tank fails on pressure/leak test.
Cheap crappy EA and flat sections often have flakey bits.
Shopping for material here is like a bazaar...you have to touch it to know it is real.
I'd appreciate reading the source of your quote just for the sake of context. Anything on pipes in the source?
Thanks.
__________________
Difficulty is not an obstacle it is merely an attribute.
Re: Minimum Thikness Requirement to Check UT Lamination of Tubular Pipe
02/03/2014 5:15 PM
"Ok"... Perhaps my wording in (my) post #3 could have been more complete, and to the point.
---
Your "OP" asked about finding laminations in pipe, and then, you make reference to two standards for checking steel plate.
---
Worse, you have not given any indication as to what the pipe is used for! Pipes carrying water or sewage are subject to totally different requirements from pipes carrying gas, oil, or other hazardous materials... (let-alone steam)!
---
A578/(M), if you followed the link (post # above) refers to: "standard and acceptance standards for straight-beam, pulse-echo, ultrasonic examination of rolled carbon and alloy steel plates."
---
A435/(M) , if you followed the link (post # above) refers to: "standard procedure and acceptance for straight-beam, pulse-echo, ultrasonic examination of rolled FULLY Killed carbon and alloy steel plates."
---
Have you searched, and looked at ANY other prospective Standards / Guides ((which might tell you what sort of acceptance criteria you 'might-ought' to be seeking)), such as:
---
((MOST Basic)) http://www.astm.org/DIGITAL_LIBRARY/STP/PAGES/STP46808S.htm
---
or, ((Next Most Basic)) http://www.astm.org/DIGITAL_LIBRARY/STP/PAGES/STP23807S.htm
---
or, http://www.astm.org/Standards/A898.htm
or, http://www.astm.org/DIGITAL_LIBRARY/STP/PAGES/STP41981S.htm
or, http://www.astm.org/DIGITAL_LIBRARY/MNL/PAGES/MNL5820131212816.htm
---
(("apologies" for not inserting* appropriate links* here... I am currently limited to working via the iPhone5 screen...!))/p[] ---
The proverbial "bottom line" here is: the more thorough your question is, the better the answers you'll receive...
---
Wishing you success~