Previous in Forum: What is Factor for Sizing of Self-Priming Unit?   Next in Forum: Design Pipeline
Close
Close
Close
5 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Associate

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 32

Minimum Thikness Requirement to Check UT Lamination of Tubular Pipe

12/12/2013 4:08 AM

what is the Minimum thikness requirement to check UT lamination of Tubular Pipe.In A578 it is mentioned as 12.5 mm and A435 it is 10 mm.our vendor says he will check only for thik above 25 mm.Kindly advice...

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Anonymous Poster #1
#1

Re: Minimum thikness requirement to check UT lamination of Tubular Pipe

12/12/2013 5:25 AM

Your vendor might have googled and read following articles well before.

However, kick out your vendor from the project site immediately, if vendor is not interested to follow Project standards or Project specifications.





Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Phnom Penh
Posts: 4019
Good Answers: 102
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Minimum thikness requirement to check UT lamination of Tubular Pipe

12/13/2013 5:35 AM

Do you have a citation or the source URL for that? Please.

I've encountered lamination /porosity in plate but never in a pipe (lucky perhaps). Normally discovered when the plate having been rolled into a cylinder and made into a fuel tank fails on pressure/leak test.

Cheap crappy EA and flat sections often have flakey bits.

Shopping for material here is like a bazaar...you have to touch it to know it is real.

I'd appreciate reading the source of your quote just for the sake of context. Anything on pipes in the source?

Thanks.

__________________
Difficulty is not an obstacle it is merely an attribute.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1035
Good Answers: 40
#3

Re: Minimum Thikness Requirement to Check UT Lamination of Tubular Pipe

12/13/2013 9:49 AM

? ? ? You ask: "What is Minimum thickness requirement to check UT lamination of Tubular Pipe?" and , you refer-to both A578 & A435...

You seem to be stymied, mystified, dumbfounded and confused as to the difference between PLATE and PIPE.

W H I C H of the two Standards do YOU think should apply...?

Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 32
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Minimum Thikness Requirement to Check UT Lamination of Tubular Pipe

01/30/2014 2:23 AM

Dear sir, Yes i am really confused kindly suggest which code to refer and which acceptance criteria to follow

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1035
Good Answers: 40
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Minimum Thikness Requirement to Check UT Lamination of Tubular Pipe

02/03/2014 5:15 PM

"Ok"... Perhaps my wording in (my) post #3 could have been more complete, and to the point. --- Your "OP" asked about finding laminations in pipe, and then, you make reference to two standards for checking steel plate. --- Worse, you have not given any indication as to what the pipe is used for! Pipes carrying water or sewage are subject to totally different requirements from pipes carrying gas, oil, or other hazardous materials... (let-alone steam)! --- A578/(M), if you followed the link (post # above) refers to: "standard and acceptance standards for straight-beam, pulse-echo, ultrasonic examination of rolled carbon and alloy steel plates." --- A435/(M) , if you followed the link (post # above) refers to: "standard procedure and acceptance for straight-beam, pulse-echo, ultrasonic examination of rolled FULLY Killed carbon and alloy steel plates." --- Have you searched, and looked at ANY other prospective Standards / Guides ((which might tell you what sort of acceptance criteria you 'might-ought' to be seeking)), such as: --- ((MOST Basic)) http://www.astm.org/DIGITAL_LIBRARY/STP/PAGES/STP46808S.htm --- or, ((Next Most Basic)) http://www.astm.org/DIGITAL_LIBRARY/STP/PAGES/STP23807S.htm --- or, http://www.astm.org/Standards/A898.htm or, http://www.astm.org/DIGITAL_LIBRARY/STP/PAGES/STP41981S.htm or, http://www.astm.org/DIGITAL_LIBRARY/MNL/PAGES/MNL5820131212816.htm --- (("apologies" for not inserting* appropriate links* here... I am currently limited to working via the iPhone5 screen...!))/p[] --- The proverbial "bottom line" here is: the more thorough your question is, the better the answers you'll receive... --- Wishing you success~

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 5 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); ndt-tom (2); umesh vikram (1); Wal (1)

Previous in Forum: What is Factor for Sizing of Self-Priming Unit?   Next in Forum: Design Pipeline

Advertisement