From this page of the brochure - "It operates on a wide variety of fuels, including white gas, diesel oil, kerosene, JP-4 aircraft turbine engine fuel, or any mixture of them." Ethanol and biodiesel, too?

Back when I was in high school, a guy I worked with (he was a retired Chrysler employee) actually had one of these. A fantastic automobile- but the exhaust was NOT cool. I always wondered why the concept just sort of disappeared...

The problem was accelerator lag- much like turbo lag in some cars today- although much of that has been engineered out.

When the driver "punched it", it took a few seconds for the turbine to wind up enough (even with an automatic transmission) to start pushing you back in your seat. Keep in mind that- at the same time- Chrysler had a 426 Cu In Hemi that could almost instantly put over 400 HP (and about 450 Lb-Ft of torque) to the rear wheels. If they had redesigned the turbine to run at about twice the speed (like the modern turbocharger manufacturers do)- with appropriate gearing for solid torque transfer- we would have seen A LOT MORE of them going into production.

That same period also had the STP turbine Indy racer that nearly won the race in its debut outing (a $4.58 bearing took it out). However, that car IDLED at over 90 MPH and the nature of the race was that rapid dead-start acceleration was virtually never required. It was SO overpowering that the response was to restrict its intake enough to make it a great pace car.