Building & Design Blog Blog

Building & Design Blog

The Building & Design Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about building projects, tools and equipment, materials and hardware, and environment & energy. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Elevator Overspeed Safeties Device Types   Next in Blog: Cold Weather Construction and Concrete
Close
Close
Close
5 comments
Rating: Comments: Nested

Type B Elevator Safeties

Posted January 21, 2011 2:45 PM by Joe Moleski

In our last post we discussed Type A safeties, which are referred to as instantaneous applied safeties for elevators. In this article, we move onto Type B Safeties. First, I want to expand upon the use of safeties in general. Commonly, we think of safeties used on traction elevators, both high and low speed variations. Hydraulic elevators also incorporate safeties depending on the elevator's design. Some hydro's use traction ropes coupled with hydraulic rams; these units require safeties. Roped-hydros have become more and more common for the low-rise market in the past several years, but they have been in use for a long time. Please keep in mind that there are may variations of safeties and we are not going to cover them all. I can provide information upon request for specific applications.

Type B safeties are basically of two designs: flexible guide and wedge clamp. Both are activated via an over-speed governor and attached rope to the safeties assembly. We will discuss the over-speed governor in future articles.

Type B safeties are applied at a slower rate than Type A. These are used in higher speed elevators as the mass is moving at greater rate; to use instantaneous safeties would result in passenger and equipment damage. Type B safeties are similar to Type A safeties in that they are positioned on each side of the two guide rails and travel with the elevator. Both the wedge and flexible guide types of safeties make for a smooth application. The safety jaws are not the quick-grabbing knurled rollers as with Type A safeties, but are commonly two flat with grooved lengths of machined steel that "squeeze" together with the guide rail sandwiched between them. With the retardation of setting force, this makes for a smoother stop. I have attempted another rudimentary drawing of one common design of these safeties. It's how the squeeze is applied that makes the difference between the two. My two drawings hopefully help you to see what I am saying.

Code dictates the stopping distance tolerances by speeds. For instance, a 500-foot-per-minute (2.53 m/s) elevator traveling in the down direction is required no less than a minimum of 20 inches (508 mm) and a maximum distance of 68 inches (1727 mm) to come to a complete stop. Type B safeties are listed in current ASME code from 0 – 2,400 fpm. We commonly find a 500 fpm elevator in low to mid-rise passenger and freight elevators.

During testing of Type B safeties, the elevator is filled to capacity with test weights and in the down direction at contract speed or in some cases, depending on local codes and procedures, at the over-speed rate. The safeties are applied via the governor by either manually tripping the setting device or, in over-speed condition, the governor will do it all. We will do more on safety tests in the next couple of articles.

In the next, we will briefly look at Type C safeties and applications of safeties on counterweights.

- Joe

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#1

Re: Type B Elevator Safeties

01/22/2011 1:40 AM

Thanks again for another interesting and informative article. Are you contemplating a book-length compilation later on? If so, it sounds like a great project.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Reply
Associate

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DeBary, Florida USA (Central Florida area - Orlando)
Posts: 39
Good Answers: 1
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Type B Elevator Safeties

01/22/2011 10:48 PM

Thank you for the kind words. We have been contemplating a elevator maintenance control program manual. Time and demand will be the deciding factor. Joe

__________________
Think Professional Services are Expensive? Try Amateurs.
Reply
Associate

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DeBary, Florida USA (Central Florida area - Orlando)
Posts: 39
Good Answers: 1
#4
In reply to #1

Re: Type B Elevator Safeties

05/12/2011 12:14 PM

Thank you for your comments. We are at the time revising and doing rewriting of the escalator module for a national licensing program for elevator/escalator technicians. Along with that we are doing a complete maintenance manual for elevators and escalators. To meet code for a maintenance manual or, Maintenance Control Program (MCP) it is huge undertaking because the manual has to direct the specific maintenance tasks for specific equipment and there are hundreds of varying equipment. We also have a general elevator/escalator manual in the works, but only doing in our spare time, if we ever find some of that! Please send any questions or comments, we enjoy the conversation. Joe

__________________
Think Professional Services are Expensive? Try Amateurs.
Reply
Participant

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1
#3

Re: Type B Elevator Safeties

05/12/2011 11:40 AM

Hello,

I am doing research on safeties. My interest is in the ones used at the former World Trade Center.

There are all kinds of wild stories floating about that the elevator cars fell during the attack. This makes no sense for two reasons:

1. The cars had safeties on them.

2. The cars had multiple ropes, some were up to 1-1/2" diameter.

Could you please help me understand what happened in this case?

Do you think it possible that all eight hoist ropes could be severed by airplane debris and if they could, would the car plummet out of control hundreds of feet?

Thank you very much.

Reply
Participant

Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 1
#5
In reply to #3

Re: Type B Elevator Safeties

07/06/2016 9:32 AM

Sorry for reviving an ancient thread. I remember seeing the remains of a few elevator machines from the WTC towers. They were beat up but mostly intact. If I remember correctly they were Otis gearless machines.
If the rope for the governor was cut there would be nothing to trip the safeties. Elevators typically don't drop in failure. If the elevator machine brake failed for some reason you would likely have an uncontrolled ascent due to the fact that they typically have a counterweight 40-50% of rated capacity. In order to get an elevator to fall you would have to either sever all the car ropes and the governor rope or sever the counterweight ropes (essentially the other end of the car ropes) and the governor rope.
To my knowledge this has only happened once when a plane hit the empire state building and an engine went thru one of the hoistways severing all ropes. The operator in the elevator plunged 70+ floors to the basement and miraculously survived. It has been theorized that the compressing air beneath the elevator car and the mass of cables bunching up under the car slowed her decent just enough for her to survive.

Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Reply to Blog Entry 5 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

David Cole (1); Joe Moleski (2); Tornado (1); Triangles (1)

Previous in Blog: Elevator Overspeed Safeties Device Types   Next in Blog: Cold Weather Construction and Concrete

Advertisement