Building & Design Blog Blog

Building & Design Blog

The Building & Design Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about building projects, tools and equipment, materials and hardware, and environment & energy. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Hydraulic Elevators and Oil Leaks   Next in Blog: Is LEED Misleading?
Close
Close
Close
4 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Lessons Learned from Haiti

Posted February 07, 2011 7:00 AM

Last year's earthquake in Haiti left a population and an infrastructure utterly devasted. This past summer, an engineering team from Purdue University visited the struggling country to perform a survey of the structures that failed in areas where building codes are rarely, if ever, enforced. While the details of that survey are forthcoming, what became immediately apparent to the team was the "awesome responsibility that all civil engineers have when it comes to our societies."

Code enforcement will more than likely remain lax, despite all the stories about how poor construction methods contributed to the devastation in Haiti. In such environments, what is the responsibility of architects, engineers, and contractors to build safe structures? Do you risk losing contracts by following sound building practices?

The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Building & Design, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Building & Design today.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
2
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: California
Posts: 2363
Good Answers: 63
#1

Re: Lessons Learned from Haiti

02/08/2011 11:32 AM

What are the responsibility of the designers and contractors? First, the designers are to design a building to meet the needs of the client, including any safety requirements that may be above the jurisdictional industry standard of practice, and to design structure to meet the standard of practice and any ordinance, regulation or laws within the jurisdiction. The contractor must buuild what is designed and if paid any add ons requested by the owner, while meeting all jurisdictional and contractual requirements. However, without enforcement the standard of practice declines as more contractors make a practice of violating codes, this saves them costs during building which means they can offer a portion of that as savings to the owners. Thus the building cost less, low bidder wins the contracts, especially in those types of regulatory environments. So yes those who build to meet the code requirements will likely lose jobs more and more as the standard of practice declines.

Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Anonymous Poster
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Lessons Learned from Haiti

02/09/2011 3:42 AM

I think the key issue is supervision. Proper supervision. If we have qualified personnel on site (Clerk of Works/Construction Mngr)to ensure that the correct things are done we will not be having these problems.

As for the client, they are always ready to pay less for everything which is natural but what we need to know is that buildings are are not things u spend money on to try and do again. Thaye are done ones and for all at least to stand for some 30yrs before any refurbishment or .......

Henry

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: California
Posts: 2363
Good Answers: 63
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Lessons Learned from Haiti

02/09/2011 1:47 PM

Even with construction Mgmt on site you still get errors commonly, if enforcement and inspection are lacking. Construction Managers are not there to make sure the quality of workmanship is up to standard, they are there to maintain schedules, budgets, and protect against or limit obvious liabilities of the Contractor (which in reality mean make sure problems are hidden or try to identify/create some linkage to use to share potential liability risks with the designers or owner). First and foremost CMs are there to make the contractor/developer money, they have absolutely no quality or safety purvue beyond the impact it may have on profitability. Inspector job is not to cosndier profitability of the contractor, but rather conformance with regulations and codes, and engineers are required to consider public safety first but still make a profit on design (only engineers and inspectors go to jail for negligence in such, not CMs). If the issue is about non-conformance with quality standards a CM definitely is not the line of defense you want onsite, but more field inspection.

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#4
In reply to #1

Re: Lessons Learned from Haiti

02/16/2011 7:52 AM

We live in a world in which our fuel resources are shrinking rapidly, growing constantly more expensive and are prone to frequent disruptions in power supply. Apart from these direct influences, combustion of fuel is causing immense and irreversible harm to our environment, depleting the all-important ozone layer and adding to the Green House Effect, which is resulting in Global Warming and abrupt changes in climatic patterns all over the world.

CR4 ADMIN: Modified Post

Spam: This post was modified because it contained advertising outside the Commercial Space forum. Please review Section 14 of the CR4 Site FAQ about advertising.

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 4 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

Previous in Blog: Hydraulic Elevators and Oil Leaks   Next in Blog: Is LEED Misleading?

Advertisement