Speaking of Precision Blog

Speaking of Precision

Speaking of Precision is a knowledge preservation and thought leadership blog covering the precision machining industry, its materials and services. With over 36 years of hands on experience in steelmaking, manufacturing, quality, and management, Miles Free (Milo) Director of Industry Research and Technology at PMPA helps answer "How?" "With what?" and occasionally "Really?"

Previous in Blog: What is Machinability?   Next in Blog: Superhero vs. Machinist
Close
Close
Close
2 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Three Considerations - Gaging Inspection Lab

Posted March 08, 2011 9:00 AM by Milo

Thermal effects can affect your results.

It's consistency of temperature, not the actual temperature, that is important.

Thermal errors can stack up.

Consistent temperature is more important than the actual temperature

For measurement uncertainty purposes, you want to assure that linear expansion dimensional errors attributable to temperature variation are minimized - less than 10% of your intended accuracy.

Thermal Expansion Coefficient - The thermal expansion coefficient (CTE) of tool steel is added to the measurement uncertainty calculation where relevant. The Testing Laboratory considers consistency in temperature most important. This policy was derived from MIL-STD-120, which states: "Whenever precision measurements are to be made, the temperature should constantly be kept as near to 68 degrees as possible. Since most gages and measuring instruments are usually made of steel …. the requirement that the temperature remain constant is more important than the actual temperature."

Based on the above statement in bold, our laboratory tracked the temperature with its computerized temperature control system over a period of a month in order to determine the amount of deviation from 68 degrees. The amount of this deviation is used to calculate the Linear Expansion per unit length per degree Fahrenheit. This amount is used in the calculation of relevant measurement uncertainties.

For steel, the coefficient we used was 0.000006″ per degree of temperature change. (That's six millionths of an inch per degree F.)

For copper and copper alloys, we used 0.000009″ per degree of temperature change. (That's nine millionths of an inch per degree F.)

For aluminum, the figure we used was 0.000013 " per degree of temperature change. (That's thirteen millionths of an inch per degree F.)

While room air conditioning is important, don't forget that handling gages can affect your measurement system, too.

Chart From Kennedy and Andrews Inspection and Gaging

Note that gaging can pick up operators' body heat and that temperature errors can thus stack up …

Photo credit:http://www.commodorecomputerclub.com/images/020411/IMG_1868.jpg

Editor's Note: CR4 would like to thank Milo for sharing this blog entry, which originally appeared here.

Register to Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1119
Good Answers: 11
#1

Re: Three Considerations - Gaging Inspection Lab

03/08/2011 11:15 AM

Sir, would this error as caused by linear expansion that significant considering like at calibration lab we maintain a constant temperature say 26 deg C. How would this affect at actual site condition say at 30degC surrounding? Does the reading at actual, deviates alittle than the real reading? Please enlighten me.

__________________
" To infinity and beyond" - Buzz Lightyear
Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 3
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Three Considerations - Gaging Inspection Lab

04/18/2011 5:24 PM

The purpose of calibration is to assure measurements can be duplicated considering site differences. If the artifact is the same size at 68 degrees, then considering the temp changes to something more, the size measurement can be compensated knowing the expansion rate of the material. The larger the artifact, the greater the temp difference, the greater the coefficient of expansion, the artifact measurement will be larger. The NIST standard for measuring instrument calibration is at 68 degrees. Certification labs are held at this temp. with great precision.

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 2 comments

Previous in Blog: What is Machinability?   Next in Blog: Superhero vs. Machinist

Advertisement