Roger's Equations Blog

Roger's Equations

This blog is all about science and technology (with occasional math thrown in for fun). The goal of this blog is to try and pass on the sense of excitement and wonder I feel when I read about these topics. I hope you enjoy the posts.

Previous in Blog: The James Webb Space Telescope   Next in Blog: The Fermi Paradox
Close
Close
Close
6 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

String Theory and Umbral Moonshine

Posted April 08, 2015 8:12 AM by Bayes

Don't Let The Name Fool You!

The mathematical terms you are about to read are going to sound bizarre, but please keep in mind that most new physics and math terms sound bizarre at first. Think about it, we live in a world of charm quarks, imaginary numbers, strange attractors, quasars and nebula. So when you're reading the article I'm passing along below, and you come across the terms Moonshine and Umbral Moonshine, just remember that these are mathematical objects that people will take for granted in the future just as we take for granted the terms transcendental numbers and manifolds.

String Theory As a Mathematical Bridge

Ok, so there are some interesting things happening in mathematics right now. In a paper recently posted to archiv.org, some mathematicians have presented a numerical proof of the Umbral Moonshine Conjecture. It is important for many reasons including that a greater understanding (and proof) of this conjecture could go a long way in helping physicists combine general relativity and quantum mechanics convincingly through string theory.

Here is a quick wikipedia link that describes Moonshine.

Below is a Scientific American article on the recent arxiv.org paper and its implications in this areas of mathematics and physics. Enjoy!

Mathematicians Chase Moonshine's Shadow

In 1978, the mathematician John McKay noticed what seemed like an odd coincidence. He had been studying the different ways of representing the structure of a mysterious entity called the monster group, a gargantuan algebraic object that, mathematicians believed, captured a new kind of symmetry. Mathematicians weren't sure that the monster group actually existed, but they knew that if it did exist, it acted in special ways in particular dimensions, the first two of which were 1 and 196,883. McKay, of Concordia University in Montreal, happened to pick up a mathematics paper in a completely different field, involving something called the j-function, one of the most fundamental objects in number theory. Strangely enough, this function's first important coefficient is 196,884, which McKay instantly recognized as the sum of the monster's first two special dimensions.

Most mathematicians dismissed the finding as a fluke, since there was no reason to expect the monster and the j-function to be even remotely related. However, the connection caught the attention of John Thompson, a Fields medalist now at the University of Florida in Gainesville, who made an additional discovery. The j-function's second coefficient, 21,493,760, is the sum of the first three special dimensions of the monster: 1 + 196,883 + 21,296,876. It seemed as if the j-function was somehow controlling the structure of the elusive monster group.Soon, two other mathematicians had demonstrated so many of these numerical relationships that it no longer seemed possible that they were mere coincidences. In a 1979 paper called "Monstrous Moonshine," the pair-John Conway, now of Princeton University, and Simon Norton-conjectured that these relationships must result from some deep connection between the monster group and the j-function. "They called it moonshine because it appeared so far-fetched," said Don Zagier, a director of the Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in Bonn, Germany. "They were such wild ideas that it seemed like wishful thinking to imagine anyone could ever prove them."

Article Continues Here

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#1

Re: String Theory and Umbral Moonshine

04/08/2015 9:13 AM

We'll see how soon some Tennesseans start to market Umbral moonshine. I'll look for it at my beverage vendor.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Reply
Anonymous Poster #1
#2
In reply to #1

Re: String Theory and Umbral Moonshine

04/08/2015 11:54 AM

If they do, the better watch out for Rosco P. Coltrane!

(RIP James Best - Thanks for laughs!!!)

Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Cosmology - Let's keep knowledge expanding Engineering Fields - Retired Engineers / Mentors - Hobbies - HAM Radio - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: North America, Earth
Posts: 4528
Good Answers: 106
#3

Re: String Theory and Umbral Moonshine

04/09/2015 6:17 PM

Does the geometrical figure you show have a name?

__________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” - Richard Feynman
Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
The Engineer
Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Physics... United States - Member - NY Popular Science - Genetics - Organic Chemistry... Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member Ingeniería en Español - Nuevo Miembro - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 5060
Good Answers: 129
#4
In reply to #3

Re: String Theory and Umbral Moonshine

04/10/2015 7:37 AM
Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#5
In reply to #4

Re: String Theory and Umbral Moonshine

04/10/2015 8:19 AM

As you know, Umbral moonshine is packaged in Klein bottles. That makes it imperative to be consumed instantly. The Coneheads only began to see the light.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru
Popular Science - Cosmology - Let's keep knowledge expanding Engineering Fields - Retired Engineers / Mentors - Hobbies - HAM Radio - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: North America, Earth
Posts: 4528
Good Answers: 106
#6
In reply to #4

Re: String Theory and Umbral Moonshine

04/10/2015 5:50 PM

Thanks. Interesting links, especially the one that shows the twisting klein.

__________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” - Richard Feynman
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 6 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); Bayes (1); StandardsGuy (2); Tornado (2)

Previous in Blog: The James Webb Space Telescope   Next in Blog: The Fermi Paradox

Advertisement