Healthcare Engineering Blog

Healthcare Engineering

The Healthcare Engineering Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about Infrastructure, Healthcare Devices and Products, Information Management, and Patient Safety and Security. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Bionics and Biology   Next in Blog: Will Photoacoustic Imaging Successfully Map the Brain?
Close
Close
Close
8 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Re-engineering Our Umwelt

Posted July 01, 2015 2:55 PM by HUSH
Pathfinder Tags: senses sensory technology umwelt

When the concept of a sixth sense comes up, it usually carries varied meanings. In the film world, it's a decently-scary movie about Haley Joel Osment telling Bruce Willis he sees dead people. Similarly, people with extra sensory perception (or perhaps those who claim to have it) are also sometimes accredited with a sixth sense. The ability of the mind to perceive the physical locations of the limbs without tactile or visual input (aka proprioception), or a person's innate sense of balance (equilibrioception), is on occasion called the sixth sense. In Buddhism, consciousness alone is enough to be the sixth sense. For some animals, echolocation, electroreception and magnetoception are a legitimate additional sense.

But for humans, when it comes to the scientifically-identified senses (those that receive external stimuli and relay that information to the brain), there are just five, if you are so lucky. Basically, everything we experience is filtered through our senses, which both empowers and limits our reality (our umwelt). However, technology is of course challenging the concept of five senses, and someday having only five senses could be a deficiency.

One common body modification is the insertion of neodynium magnets into the ring finger that allows the wearer to detect all types of electric fields, as well as pick up tiny ferrous objects. However, this should be viewed more as an extension of the touch sense, as the magnet vibrates in the presence of a field, and it is not true electroreception but rather a a post-sensory cognitive determination. Similarly, other finger-worn devices can alert the wearer to things like infrared light or sonar when paired with a separately worn sensor, but once again augments current senses instead of finding new ones.

However, these wearable technologies are just the leading edge of what's possible with wearables. According to neuroscientist David Eagleman, the brain is capable of receiving and translating much more sensory information. It's what makes blind people capable of "sight" by wearing spatial awareness glasses. Visual information is translated to audio data, and eventually blind users can determine the layout of rooms or location of objects.

Now Eagleman and a partner have engineered a vest that translates the sonic word into distinct vibrations that represent the sound wave in motors worn on a vest. A deaf individual wore the vest and after a few days began to recognize the vibration patterns for specific words. This biohack provided an alternative way for him to hear the world.

Eagleman has also fed different types of data streams through the vest: the stock market, Twitter reactions, instrument panel data, and much more can all be experienced. Wearable technologies are expected to explode in the next several years, from a $15 million market in 2014 to one over $1 billion in 2019. It's completely possible the biggest driver for wearable technology adoption is to augment current senses or obtain sensory information that's currently unavailable to humans. Glasses might provide the ability to see radio frequencies. Your watch can vibrate when you've been exposed to too much UV and are at risk of sunburn. Your hat can keep you updated on the football game.

Of course, virtually any sensor could be linked to a vibratory vest or other garment, so it's tough to say they constitute true additional sensors. As of now, this additional sensory input requires specialized clothing. However, there has been considerable interest in 3D printing human tissue as well as circuits. Combine the two and suddenly sensors can be embedded into the skin, making bio-integrated sensor--a la Inspector Gadget--a true possibility.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Large hole formally occupied by furry woodland creature.
Posts: 3385
Good Answers: 97
#1

Re: Re-engineering Our Umwelt

07/01/2015 5:03 PM

One drawback I see for embedded sensors, especially magnets, is the possibility that exposure to intense magnetic fields, such as MRI would have risks.

__________________
CRTL-Z
Reply
Guru

Join Date: May 2011
Location: Northern California
Posts: 805
Good Answers: 81
#3
In reply to #1

Re: Re-engineering Our Umwelt

07/02/2015 11:01 AM

Also, imagine how many metal splinters your magnet would pick up and embed in your skin.

__________________
"Why do things that only happen to stupid people keep happening to me?" Homer Simpson
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 859
Good Answers: 33
#4
In reply to #1

Re: Re-engineering Our Umwelt

07/02/2015 12:16 PM

ESpecially if you had forgotten when and where they were implanted!

Reply
Guru
New Zealand - Member - Kiwi Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 8777
Good Answers: 376
#6
In reply to #1

Re: Re-engineering Our Umwelt

07/05/2015 11:32 PM

You just watch, the same crowd that loudly proclaims magnetic fields from the power lines and home appliances are harmful will be lining up for magnet implantation.

__________________
jack of all trades
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: by the beach in Florida
Posts: 33392
Good Answers: 1817
#2

Re: Re-engineering Our Umwelt

07/02/2015 1:11 AM

Always thought skin was too fragile for practical real world living...It would be great to have super skin!

__________________
All living things seek to control their own destiny....this is the purpose of life
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: About 4000 miles from the center of the earth (+/-100 mi)
Posts: 9913
Good Answers: 1141
#5

Re: Re-engineering Our Umwelt

07/03/2015 10:54 AM

Garments with sensors is not a bad idea. Embedding magnets in your fingers is.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 989
Good Answers: 14
#7

Re: Re-engineering Our Umwelt

10/31/2015 3:12 AM

After having raised a couple litters of dogs in the last few years I realize now how 'muted' our senses have become compared to theirs.

I've seen them communicate in the woods over half a mile or so without me being able to hear them, seen them follow 3 day old cold trails in 8" of snow, mud and ice.

Plott Hounds were bred to hunt bears and other carnivores but the most impressive sight was the inter-communications of a small pack of coyotes sending all 4 of my dogs headed under the porch.

No doubt the human race started out with what we now call 'instincts'. How else could so many generations of pre-historic man survive for thousands of years as hunter-gatherers?

What these inventions really do is Sensory Enhancement. Changing language communication from hearing to touch is not creating another sense, it is simply switching the input source to a backup alternate input or amplifying the signal to perceivable levels.

To add a new sense you would have to add a new organ.

Otherwise you are just modifying the inputs to the original 5.

Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member Fans of Old Computers - Commodore 64 - New Member Popular Science - Evolution - New Member United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Illinois, 7 county region (The 'blue dot' that drags the rest of the 'red state' around during presidential elections.)
Posts: 3683
Good Answers: 89
#8
In reply to #7

Re: Re-engineering Our Umwelt

11/11/2015 3:13 PM

"Otherwise you are just modifying the inputs to the original 5."

Six, I'm assuming you forgot about Proprioception, or 'kinesthetic sense.' It's an easy one to forget, since we normally use it unconsciously, unlike sight, hearing, touch, taste and smell, which we often use deliberately.

Drop your hands to your side, close your eyes, tilt your head back, and WHILE KEEPING YOUR EYES CLOSED, touch the tip of your nose with the tip of your index finger.

Did you have to 'feel your way up your body to find your head, then search for your nose? Or did you simply lift your arm and bring your hand through open space until the tip of your index finger touched your nose, with the rest of the fingers curled to the palm? We use it so often and without thinking about it, that the only time we are aware of this sense is when it's 'going wrong,' and what it is telling us about our body position and pose does not agree with what our other senses are telling us, typically because the other senses are being 'lied to,' but we seem to lend more credence to the 'main five' instead of to the more reliable kinesthetic sense.

__________________
( The opinions espressed in this post may not reflect the true opinions of the poster, and may not reflect commonly accepted versions of reality. ) (If you are wondering: yes, I DO hope to live to be as old as my jokes.)
Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Reply to Blog Entry 8 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

129CBRider (1); adreasler (1); C-Mac (1); jack of all trades (1); jhowdy (1); Rixter (1); SolarEagle (1); Unredundant (1)

Previous in Blog: Bionics and Biology   Next in Blog: Will Photoacoustic Imaging Successfully Map the Brain?

Advertisement