Aren't at least half the states in the US already suing the EPA for its misinterpretations/overstepping of its boundaries related to other things now as well?

"Is the glass half full or half empty?"

"We'll let the lawyers decide on that one"

While the Engineers sit back and say "The glass has 100% surplus capacity, it can hold double what it currently has."

And the Bartender chimes in, "Quit playing with your drinks and drink, this is a tavern, not a knitting club."

I don't think there is that much beer drinking at knitting clubs. What, everyone takes a drink if someone drops a stitch?

I fail to see the major advantage of burning ethanol other than to supplement the use of other fossil fuels. It produces more CO2 when burned on an energy normalized basis, requires more energy to process, and the theory of crop sequestration of atmospheric CO2 is just that a theory. Most tilled crops actually are a source of CO2 not a sink.

crop sequestration? I didn't think 'short-lived' plants were considered useful for that; that for human needs we had to tink in terms of plants that live for centuries, aka trees.