Derivations Blog

Derivations

A place for deriving stuff. We take requests.

Previous in Blog: Delensing the Cosmic Background Radiation   Next in Blog: Neutrino-Antineutrino Flavor Oscillation Discrepancy
Close
Close
Close
6 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

When Nothing Means Something

Posted August 10, 2016 9:07 AM by Bayes

One of the more interesting results of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) to date has be the lack of anything...unexpected. For years physicists have been developing complex mathematical theories that predicted multiple "families" of particles. Many of these hypothetical particles should have shown up in the LHC data, but have not.

Here is an interesting article that discusses the issue and its consequences to particle physics...

What No New Particles Means for Physics

Pysicists at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Europe have explored the properties of nature at higher energies than ever before, and they have found something profound: nothing new.

It’s perhaps the one thing that no one predicted 30 years ago when the project was first conceived.

The infamous “diphoton bump” that arose in data plots in December has disappeared, indicating that it was a fleeting statistical fluctuation rather than a revolutionary new fundamental particle. And in fact, the machine’s collisions have so far conjured up no particles at all beyond those catalogued in the long-reigning but incomplete “Standard Model” of particle physics. In the collision debris, physicists have found no particles that could comprise dark matter, no siblings or cousins of the Higgs boson, no sign of extra dimensions, no leptoquarks — and above all, none of the desperately sought supersymmetry particles that would round out equations and satisfy “naturalness,” a deep principle about how the laws of nature ought to work.

“It’s striking that we’ve thought about these things for 30 years and we have not made one correct prediction that they have seen,” said Nima Arkani-Hamed, a professor of physics at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, N.J.

The news has emerged at the International Conference on High Energy Physics in Chicago over the past few days in presentations by the ATLAS and CMS experiments, whose cathedral-like detectors sit at 6 and 12 o’clock on the LHC’s 17-mile ring. Both teams, each with over 3,000 members, have been working feverishly for the past three months analyzing a glut of data from a machine that is finally running at full throttle after being upgraded to nearly double its previous operating energy. It now collides protons with 13 trillion electron volts (TeV) of energy — more than 13,000 times the protons’ individual masses — providing enough raw material to beget gargantuan elementary particles, should any exist.

Article Continues Here

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
Engineering Fields - Optical Engineering - Member Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Member Engineering Fields - Systems Engineering - Member

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Trantor
Posts: 5363
Good Answers: 647
#1

Re: When Nothing Means Something

08/10/2016 9:18 AM

__________________
Whiskey, women -- and astrophysics. Because sometimes a problem can't be solved with just whiskey and women.
Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South of Minot North Dakota
Posts: 8376
Good Answers: 775
#2

Re: When Nothing Means Something

08/10/2016 10:16 PM

So just maybe all their theoretical math, they tried to do with the alphabet no less, was just a bunch of misguided BS that doesn't mean diddly poo in reality after all?

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: About 4000 miles from the center of the earth (+/-100 mi)
Posts: 9912
Good Answers: 1141
#6
In reply to #2

Re: When Nothing Means Something

08/14/2016 3:24 PM

You might enjoy this book...

It's about "renormalization", cancelling out infinities, which seems to be very questionable mathematically but just happens to give the right answer.

Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 373
Good Answers: 2
#3

Re: When Nothing Means Something

08/11/2016 9:38 AM

Maybe the LHC guys are finding themselves in the (particle) physics version the ''infinity gap'' of math, where there is no connection between all real numbers and infinity, or...perhaps the LHC is creating ''substances'' beyond the capability of their sensors to detect. Back to the Twilight Zone.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Where the sun sets on OZ
Posts: 1381
Good Answers: 28
#4

Re: When Nothing Means Something

08/12/2016 2:21 AM

The LHC is a huge kickass machine but now i have an an image of a nerdy kid standing there with his hands on his hips saying; "We're gonna need a bigger boot."

__________________
Where's the KaBoom? There should be a KaBoom!
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 104
Good Answers: 5
#5

Re: When Nothing Means Something

08/12/2016 9:34 AM

Or maybe they have pummeled those new particles back to last Tuesday and nobody turned on the recording machine to run backwards

__________________
deanpavil
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 6 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

bullardrr (1); deanpavil (1); JIMRAT (1); Rixter (1); tcmtech (1); Usbport (1)

Previous in Blog: Delensing the Cosmic Background Radiation   Next in Blog: Neutrino-Antineutrino Flavor Oscillation Discrepancy

Advertisement