Hemmings Motor News Blog Blog

Hemmings Motor News Blog

Hemmings Motor News has been around since 1954. We're proud of our heritage, but we're also more than the Hemmings full of classifieds that your father subscribed to. Aside from new editorial content every month in Hemmings, we have three monthly magazines: Hemmings Muscle Machines, Hemmings Classic Car and Hemmings Sports and Exotic Car.

While our editors traverse the country to find the best content for those magazines, we find other oddities related to the old-car hobby that we really had no place for - until now. With this blog, we're giving you a behind-the-scenes look at what we see and what we do during the course of putting out some of the finest automotive magazines you'll ever read.

Previous in Blog: This or That – Summer Series: 1959 Mercury Park Lane or 1960 Buick LeSabre?   Next in Blog: Exploring East Texas Backroads in the Bugtussle Caddy
Close
Close
Close
13 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Gearing for Go or No: Do You Prefer High-Revs or Low-Revs?

Posted July 25, 2018 9:00 AM by dstrohl

In my pre-driving teenage years, I had older friends who were hooked on installing steep rear gears in the late-1960s and early-to-mid-1970s used cars they owned and modified. They liked to blast from stoplight to stoplight, not to mention doing burnouts to show off for the rest of us whenever the opportunity presented itself.

Given their examples, you’d think that when I got my license and my car, I’d want to do the same, but instead, I became a proponent of more reasonable rear gearing that provided lower rpm on the highway. Part of it may be due to the fact that like most teenagers, my car was my daily driver, not a purpose-built hell-raiser that didn’t have to get me to work and school each weekday. Yet many of those friends had been in the same situation, so go figure.

You go low, I go high. We'll meet on the highway.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Automotive Performance - New Member Technical Fields - Education - New Member Fans of Old Computers - TRS-80 - New Member Hobbies - Musician - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1331
Good Answers: 30
#1

Re: Gearing for Go or No: Do You Prefer High-Revs or Low-Revs?

07/25/2018 9:24 AM

In my youthful "hot rod" days it was ALL about high-rpm acceleration (high gearing 3.90-4.11:1).

These days (retirement) it's NOW about low-rpms for fuel economy (low gearing 2-3:1).

__________________
...and the Devil said: "...yes, but it's a DRY heat..!"
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1694
#2

Re: Gearing for Go or No: Do You Prefer High-Revs or Low-Revs?

07/25/2018 7:34 PM

I never had the money to hot rod.

Now, I'm with 70AARCuda.

I'm getting rid of my full size 4 door truck and buying a SUV.

Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: MSP, MN
Posts: 728
Good Answers: 8
#3

Re: Gearing for Go or No: Do You Prefer High-Revs or Low-Revs?

07/26/2018 8:50 AM

With my QC rear, I can do stump-puller around town, and change to loafing on the Interstates:

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CA (Central Arkansas, USA)
Posts: 599
Good Answers: 10
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Gearing for Go or No: Do You Prefer High-Revs or Low-Revs?

07/26/2018 9:16 AM

And the QC looks good! - JHF

__________________
If it's too good to be true, it probably isn't
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Madison, WI.
Posts: 2074
Good Answers: 77
#5

Re: Gearing for Go or No: Do You Prefer High-Revs or Low-Revs?

07/26/2018 9:59 AM

The "pumpkin" wars. :-)

I prefered the ability to corner under hard acceleration in the mid and upper RPM ranges.

__________________
Knowing is the end result of learning, not believing.
Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Automotive Performance - New Member Technical Fields - Education - New Member Fans of Old Computers - TRS-80 - New Member Hobbies - Musician - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1331
Good Answers: 30
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Gearing for Go or No: Do You Prefer High-Revs or Low-Revs?

07/26/2018 12:22 PM

Anybody remember back in 1950's when "over-drive" boxes were available both OEM and aftermarket which bolted onto the back end of the existing manual gearbox?

I had one on my '53 flathead Ford which I believe originally came from a 55-57 T-bird.

__________________
...and the Devil said: "...yes, but it's a DRY heat..!"
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CA (Central Arkansas, USA)
Posts: 599
Good Answers: 10
#7
In reply to #6

Re: Gearing for Go or No: Do You Prefer High-Revs or Low-Revs?

07/26/2018 1:02 PM

Yea, Studebaker used them a lot in all their cars. I had 2 of them. With the right rear gear 2nd over was higher than 3rd direct. Took some getting used to the shift pattern. I know Merc used the same basic trans but the case was different. Everything inside the trans and the OD unit was the same. It was a Borg-Warner T86E in Stude and T86 F in the Merc. There was also a T83 in the small Stude Champion.- JHF

__________________
If it's too good to be true, it probably isn't
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Madison, WI.
Posts: 2074
Good Answers: 77
#8
In reply to #6

Re: Gearing for Go or No: Do You Prefer High-Revs or Low-Revs?

07/26/2018 3:00 PM

My 64 Studebaker Cruiser had one and a hang under ARA air conditioner, both from the factory back in the days when you ordered the car to your specifications. 35 hiway mpg out of a 283 with a 4bbl, not sure why we stopped.

__________________
Knowing is the end result of learning, not believing.
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CA (Central Arkansas, USA)
Posts: 599
Good Answers: 10
#9
In reply to #8

Re: Gearing for Go or No: Do You Prefer High-Revs or Low-Revs?

07/26/2018 4:08 PM

Was the motor a Stude or a Chevy? They used Chevy Canada motors for a while just before they went under. The Chevy would be 283 cube, the Stude was 289.

__________________
If it's too good to be true, it probably isn't
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Madison, WI.
Posts: 2074
Good Answers: 77
#10
In reply to #9

Re: Gearing for Go or No: Do You Prefer High-Revs or Low-Revs?

07/26/2018 4:22 PM

Yep, Canadian 283 with an automatic and the OD bolted on to the tailshaft and activated by a T handle under the dash. Th manual said only use it when the car was in Drive and at speed.

__________________
Knowing is the end result of learning, not believing.
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CA (Central Arkansas, USA)
Posts: 599
Good Answers: 10
#11
In reply to #10

Re: Gearing for Go or No: Do You Prefer High-Revs or Low-Revs?

07/26/2018 4:54 PM

Thanks. Couldn't remember the year they switched. My Studebaker was a 55 with a 259 cube v8. Ran fair and got 25 mpg or better. Probably could have done better if I would have kept my foot out of the carburetor! - JHF

__________________
If it's too good to be true, it probably isn't
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 633
Good Answers: 13
#12

Re: Gearing for Go or No: Do You Prefer High-Revs or Low-Revs?

07/26/2018 8:36 PM

back in the early '70's I built 400sb and ran in a '62 vet I'd bought at auction (12.5-1 Jahns pistons, forged crank, 2.02 polished intakes, Holly DP 650 cfm)shift point 5600rpm Ran 4.56 gears on street to wax Cadets new 427 vet's, did a swap out to 3.03's 1 night to run for top end and waxed him again...gearing depends on driving conditions...roads, traffic, and enforcement today make that a bad idea today...fines would be too expensive.

Reply
The Engineer
Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Physics... United States - Member - NY Popular Science - Genetics - Organic Chemistry... Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member Ingeniería en Español - Nuevo Miembro - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 5060
Good Answers: 129
#13

Re: Gearing for Go or No: Do You Prefer High-Revs or Low-Revs?

07/27/2018 10:44 AM

At this point, with all the traffic lights being replaced with traffic circles, I'm more worried about active suspension and center of mass so I can whip around the circles faster.

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 13 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

70AARCuda (2); Bayes (1); Circuit Breaker (4); geraldpaxton (1); lyn (1); rashavarek (3); SSCpal (1)

Previous in Blog: This or That – Summer Series: 1959 Mercury Park Lane or 1960 Buick LeSabre?   Next in Blog: Exploring East Texas Backroads in the Bugtussle Caddy

Advertisement