Hemmings Motor News Blog Blog

Hemmings Motor News Blog

Hemmings Motor News has been around since 1954. We're proud of our heritage, but we're also more than the Hemmings full of classifieds that your father subscribed to. Aside from new editorial content every month in Hemmings, we have three monthly magazines: Hemmings Muscle Machines, Hemmings Classic Car and Hemmings Sports and Exotic Car.

While our editors traverse the country to find the best content for those magazines, we find other oddities related to the old-car hobby that we really had no place for - until now. With this blog, we're giving you a behind-the-scenes look at what we see and what we do during the course of putting out some of the finest automotive magazines you'll ever read.

Previous in Blog: Announced! 2024 Ford Mustang Horsepower Numbers!   Next in Blog: Carspotting: Santa Monica, 1980s
Close
Close
Close
5 comments

Open Diff - Should Modifications Made for Safety's Sake Count Against a Car?

Posted January 03, 2023 5:00 AM by dstrohl
Pathfinder Tags: car culture car safety

Every time I wander out to the garage to try to make a little time to work on my Chenowth project, I find myself looking sideways at the steering column that the sand rail came with. Frankly, "steering column" is a glorified term for what's just a long rusty bar of steel between the steering box and the steering wheel. No sections designed to collapse in a crash, just one support keeping it place, not even a universal joint in the system. As with pretty much any car built before 1968, there's a high likelihood of that column spearing right through my chest if I'm ever in a front-end collision once I get the car on the road. So you betcha I'm thinking about ways to adapt a collapsible column to the car once I get to that end of it.

On a car like this -- one for which there is no such thing as "factory correct" -- it's just another modification to add to the list. But for restorers of cars built prior to the implementation of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards and prior to the widespread adoption of collapsible columns, such a modification proves a dilemma: Make your car significantly safer to drive or preserve its original and unsafe components?

Not a month goes by without us hearing about another member of the collector car community dying or sustaining significant injuries in a crash in one of their old cars. Crashes happen, no matter how prepared we think we are, and no matter how accomplished a driver we believe ourselves to be. The only way to avoid all chance of a crash in an old car is to trailer it everywhere and never put gasoline in the tank. We accept some measure of risk every time we drive our old cars, just as we do every time we drive our new cars, so it should only be natural to mitigate that risk as much as possible, right? If not for yourself than for the friends and family members who ride along with you.

I'm not arguing that every old car should be re-engineered to incorporate safety cells and crumple zones and airbags. But I am arguing that judges -- whether those with boater hats and clipboards or those self-appointed arbiters of authenticity -- should keep their red pens and social media commentary to themselves anytime they see that a car owner has installed seat belts, improved lighting, fuel tank rollover valves, non-rigid steering columns, dual-circuit brakes or any other easily implemented safety device in their otherwise stock older vehicle. Some club-level judging standards already allow for certain safety items. Some even require fire extinguishers beside vehicles when displaying them. The more that allow and even encourage non-stock safety equipment, the less hesitation the average enthusiast who enjoys a trip around the block every now and then will have about installing such equipment.

What say you? Does your club permit non-stock safety items without points penalties? What safety equipment have you installed on your otherwise stock vehicle? Should there be no exceptions for anything not to original specifications? Or did you just bypass this dilemma altogether by purchasing a Volvo? Let us know in the comments below.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Power-User

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 237
Good Answers: 12
#1

Re: Open Diff - Should Modifications Made for Safety's Sake Count Against a Car?

01/03/2023 10:46 PM

I've thrown away old electrical items because they didn't have ground wires and weren't double-insulated. I don't want to get hurt by them, and don't want other people to get hurt by them, either.

My '59 'Vette has seat belts and radial tires. My 1948 Navion airplane has shoulder straps. I enjoy these old machines, but I don't want to die in them. Safety is paramount.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: by the beach in Florida
Posts: 33317
Good Answers: 1810
#2

Re: Open Diff - Should Modifications Made for Safety's Sake Count Against a Car?

01/04/2023 4:06 AM

Looking authentic and being authentic I think are two different things...You should be able to make improvements for dealing with safety and dependability as long as it looks authentic...being strictly authentic is for show only cars like in museums that are for display only...imo

__________________
All living things seek to control their own destiny....this is the purpose of life
Reply
Associate

Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 38
#3

Re: Open Diff - Should Modifications Made for Safety's Sake Count Against a Car?

01/04/2023 5:18 AM

"such a modification proves a dilemma: Make your car significantly safer to drive or preserve its original and unsafe components?" - no, there is no dilemma! Except if you want to drive that car with over 100 km/h, which will be suicide! This old car is to drive with 40-50-max 60km/h and enjoy the ride, not to race. If you drive it carefully, why you bother of "that column spearing right through my chest if I'm ever in a front-end collision"? Keep it authentic as possible.

Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Posts: 215
Good Answers: 14
#5
In reply to #3

Re: Open Diff - Should Modifications Made for Safety's Sake Count Against a Car?

01/11/2023 1:02 AM

Unless of course it is the other driver at fault in a head-on situation, even at comparatively low speeds, or a mechanical failure on your vintage car causing you to lose control and T-bone another vehicle, etc. And many vintage cars can easily run at 100km/h, no pottering around at 60 km/h here, you'll be driven off the road by overtaking trucks!

Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PA.
Posts: 129
Good Answers: 8
#4

Re: Open Diff - Should Modifications Made for Safety's Sake Count Against a Car?

01/06/2023 12:02 PM

A good friend has restored ( mostly ) a 1968 GT350 Cobra Mustang. the previous owner had molded in the side air scoops as opposed to the bolt on style on the original. He had his arse handed to him for not changing it back, even though it looks better overall. Though not a safety issue, it falls in the same general genre. I personally like the look of the molded scoops, as does he, and the car is a driver, not a trailer queen. Personal thoughts are, if you can make it safe but hide the safety mods, and you aren't working on a concourse vehicle, screw them and do what makes sense to you.

__________________
If the chips are down, the buffalo must be eating geese.
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 5 comments
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

gideon (1); Hameleon (1); mastrsmth (1); SolarEagle (1); steve45 (1)

Previous in Blog: Announced! 2024 Ford Mustang Horsepower Numbers!   Next in Blog: Carspotting: Santa Monica, 1980s

Advertisement