Building & Design Blog Blog

Building & Design Blog

The Building & Design Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about building projects, tools and equipment, materials and hardware, and environment & energy. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: EC Products Go Green   Next in Blog: How the Pyramids were Really Built
Close
Close
Close
2 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Where's the Risk?

Posted January 05, 2008 6:30 AM by Sharkles

"The 'at risk' CM (Construction Manager) looks to the Owner and politely informs him what the costs will be. He also informs the Owner what the additional time he will need unless the Owner is willing to pay the premium to accelerate the schedule. Where's the risk?! I don't get it." — Michael Kenig, Vice Chairman of Holder Construction Company. In this editorial, Kenig goes on to explain what is meant by "at risk" and how the concept can make sense. What do you think?

The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Building & Construction, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Building & Construction today.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Anonymous Poster
#1

Re: Where's the Risk?

01/08/2008 10:01 PM
Reply
Anonymous Poster
#2

Re: Where's the Risk?

01/15/2008 4:00 PM

Design Flaw Cited in Bridge Collapse

Divers search for victims near the Interstate 35W bridge which collapsed ove...

By FREDERIC J. FROMMER, AP
50 minutes ago

WASHINGTON — Undersized gusset plates in the Interstate 35-W bridge in Minneapolis were "the critical factor" in the bridge collapse last year that killed 13 people and injured 100, the National Transportation Safety Board said Tuesday.

Chairman Mark Rosenker said the plates, which connected steel beams, were roughly half the thickness they should have been because of a design error. Investigators found 16 fractured gusset plates from the bridge's center span, he said.

"It is the undersizing of the design which we believe is the critical factor here. It is the critical factor that began the process of this collapse. That's what failed," Rosenker said.

The Minneapolis bridge was a steel-deck truss bridge that opened in 1967. Rosenker said it wasn't clear how the design flaw made it into the bridge because investigators couldn't find the design calculations.

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 2 comments

Previous in Blog: EC Products Go Green   Next in Blog: How the Pyramids were Really Built

Advertisement