Engineering360: "California's climate change goals could be met with CSS"

One of the silliest technologies invented.

I would like to see the risk assessment.

I would like to see more detail on the CO2 or C storage proposal.

I suspect we will have no long-term choice but to go with fast nuclear reactors.

want to capture carbon, plant more trees. where? plant in place of those vineyards... oh wait, can't do that.. instead, lets make the the rest of the country pay for California's pipedreams.so ridiculous.

Has anyone happen to look at the solar period? we are now hitting record sunspot lows. anyone notice the colder weather? more snow? uh huh, when the temperature of the earth lowers (due to less radiation and increase of volcano eruptions),notice the increase in earthquake activity in PR? all we need is one or two volcanic eruptions and all this nonsense will be tossed out the window, cheap energy is going to be needed to heat those oversized homes that were built.

This should serve as a warning of how things could go wrong Lake Nyos

I have never heard about this before now. Thanks for the link.

Understandably, we know how safe underground storage of compressed gasses is in California. Nothing could go wrong, could it?

I understand, that was quite a sight.

Save the plants. Don't hoard CO2.