If Stainless steel bolts for newly fabricated, U stamped heat exchanger body flange (Shell-tubesheet-channel) are going to be replaced by Carbon steel bolts to conform with client requirements, shall R stamp be required?
You should post only one, it's clear enough to see on the screen and forum does not tolerate duplicate threads. Wait for a moment the specialists are coming for your query
Reported.
__________________
The doctor said "just one post or reply aday in CR4, take it or leave it". I said, "what does that mean?"
Hi phoenix911, Thanks for your reply. We are the owner of the Heat exhanger which was fabricated and U stamped by a supplier.The equipment was already supplied but bolts were found not acording to our requirements (SS instead of CS). By "documented", do you mean it needs only updating documents (drawings, etc) without making R stamp?
It has been quite some time since I was the engineering manager of a ASME shop. So my knowledge is out dated.
I'll tell you what I knew at the time.
There is no welding done on the heat exchanger, so an 'R' stamp is not required.
And the fasteners was always a grey area, because fasteners are replaced periodically
A shell and tube heated exchanger is tested individually,
The Tube is tested, and the shell is tested, the fasteners was a grey area were there was not much on how they are to be handled with the exception of that they had to be an approved material.
And when I asked for the documentation from our supplier (Ferguson), they were actually a little surprised by that, because no one every requested that for fasteners before., but they sent over documentation on it.
And these documentations were only the material and it was very basic.
One thing you can do is call the supplier, they would give you an up to date requirement.
__________________
“ When people get what they want, they are often surprised when they get what they deserve " - James Wood
Hi whitephone, thanks for your reply. I was thinking that caculations need to be revised. Hence, R stamp is required. Am I correct? If calculations is revised, would not that require an R stamp?