The gas turbine at my combined cycle power plant uses the Mark VI as its control system. It also uses the Bently Nevada 3500 for vibration monitoring purposes. I have reviewed the Mark VI control logic and it seems just fine on its own i.e. the Mark VI is all the turbine needs for all of its control needs. It also happens to receive direct input from the vibration probes and speed pickups so I don't see why the Bently Nevada is needed at all. I understand that the Bently Nevada 3500 is used for advanced vibration monitoring applications which cannot be realized with Mark VI alone i.e. phase analysis etc. but it also seems to incorporate relay based logic for certain alarms as well.
This is a little confusing for me because on top of it all, we also have ABB DCS tending to the monitoring and control of the turbine. I have yet to review the logic on the DCS but I am sure it is only used for stuff other than the gas turbine i.e. the HRSG, alarms etc.
I guess the Mark VI is the primary controller for the gas turbine. The relay logic implemented on the Bently Nevada is only to provide a bit of redundancy/back-up in case of emergency. Is this a fair assessment?
Thanks.
"Almost" Good Answers: