Previous in Forum: Which Technology Is The Most Cost Effective?   Next in Forum: Putt Putt, 1300KM
Close
Close
Close
11 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
The Engineer
Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Physics... United States - Member - NY Popular Science - Genetics - Organic Chemistry... Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member Ingeniería en Español - Nuevo Miembro - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 5060
Good Answers: 129

Neil deGrasse Tyson Advocating for NASA Funding

06/25/2016 2:27 PM

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#1

Re: Neil deGrasse Tyson Advocating for NASA Funding

06/25/2016 2:50 PM

I've read recently that NASA funded a study on the effect that discovery of alien life would have on theology. I don't know if that is true, but if it is, I would give them a William Proxmire "Golden Fleece" award, or a Laugh-In "Fickle Finger of Fate."

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: by the beach in Florida
Posts: 33392
Good Answers: 1817
#3
In reply to #1

Re: Neil deGrasse Tyson Advocating for NASA Funding

06/25/2016 3:10 PM
__________________
All living things seek to control their own destiny....this is the purpose of life
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: About 4000 miles from the center of the earth (+/-100 mi)
Posts: 9911
Good Answers: 1141
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Neil deGrasse Tyson Advocating for NASA Funding

06/26/2016 5:20 PM

It depends on whether we're talking about alien life (like microbes) or alien intelligent life. I suspect the former would not have much of an impact. If the latter, I suspect the impact would be major, not only for religion but for everything else.

For intelligent alien life to come here, they would be far more advanced than we are. I'm not sure what we would have to offer. The best we could hope for is that they would be interested in studying us. The worst would be that we might be considered a unique delicacy for the table.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: by the beach in Florida
Posts: 33392
Good Answers: 1817
#2

Re: Neil deGrasse Tyson Advocating for NASA Funding

06/25/2016 2:55 PM
__________________
All living things seek to control their own destiny....this is the purpose of life
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 175
Good Answers: 12
#5

Re: Neil deGrasse Tyson Advocating for NASA Funding

06/27/2016 3:28 PM

I have no problem with the question, at all. Because the answer is, there is no life out there....period.

We won't find anything in the way of life out there. Just sterile voids of matter and vaccuum, that go eternally in all directions from here.

Let me turn this question around on its head: If we came from a lightning strike on a pond of primordial soup, why aren't scientists all around the globe trying to recreate the results in the lab? Shouldn't they be hoping for the same result, and hailed as pioneers, or proving the LACK of an existence on God? Shouldn't they be pouring gobs of money at it, like we do to explore other planets in search of that ever elusive life elsewhere......? After all, life happened completely randomly, right??

I mean, it should only take a little while to recreate the best possible circumstances for it to happen, right?? Lab scientists, universities, etc., should be able to shave a trillion years off of the first time it happened, right?? Or, how about shaving 999 billion years off of it? Or, how about shaving off an additional 999 million years??

If scientists REALLY believed life on earth happened that way, why aren't they setting about proving it??

__________________
Invention is the mother of necessity.......there are always opportunities for improvement!!
Register to Reply Score 2 for Off Topic
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Neil deGrasse Tyson Advocating for NASA Funding

06/27/2016 3:43 PM

For one minor glitch in your rant, you can't shave a trillion years off something that is only about 13.8 billion years old. (And especially if you go on to believe only 6000 years old.)

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 175
Good Answers: 12
#7
In reply to #6

Re: Neil deGrasse Tyson Advocating for NASA Funding

06/27/2016 4:01 PM

Prove it! Prove that it is only 13.8 billion years old. Prove how old the universe is, while you're at it.

Since you say I was on a rant, go ahead and prove what you base YOUR PREMISE on, for which you criticize my questions......go ahead! I can't wait to see this......

__________________
Invention is the mother of necessity.......there are always opportunities for improvement!!
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Power-User

Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 175
Good Answers: 12
#8
In reply to #6

Re: Neil deGrasse Tyson Advocating for NASA Funding

06/27/2016 4:09 PM

And, to your assumption, why couldn't scientists recreate in the lab, in say, 5 years, what it took "13.8 billion years" to happen randomly......by creating the best possible primordial soup?

AGAIN, why aren't universities and labs across the globe pouring money into THAT???

It would be a hull-of-a-lot cheaper than exploring other worlds......AND, prove the same thing.

It would prove all the Darwinists, the happenstancers, correct......

So, why aren't they trying?

(Perhaps because they know it is futile??)

__________________
Invention is the mother of necessity.......there are always opportunities for improvement!!
Register to Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#9
In reply to #8

Re: Neil deGrasse Tyson Advocating for NASA Funding

06/27/2016 5:36 PM

That may be the most offensively damned stupid question I have ever heard. For starters, make up your mind whether the universe is trillions of years old versus 6000 years old. There is pretty good evidence for ~13.8 billion years. Your use of prove/proof is improper.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Power-User
United States - US - Statue of Liberty - Who is John Galt?

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 166
Good Answers: 3
#10

Re: Neil deGrasse Tyson Advocating for NASA Funding

06/27/2016 5:42 PM

NASA = Nothing Accomplished Since Apollo

While I was a fan of the agency as a child, I'm one of those who firmly believes the agency should be scrapped, the crusty overpaid senior citizens making the decisions retired, put out to pasture, given the gold watch, etc...

Then we'll have the $$$$ to create a new NASA-II agency created and staffed with 'young-uns' (mean age 24.75 years old) and no one over 30 allowed to have a permanent office with a door!

__________________
I'd've written a shorter post, but I didn't have the time.
Register to Reply
The Engineer
Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Physics... United States - Member - NY Popular Science - Genetics - Organic Chemistry... Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member Ingeniería en Español - Nuevo Miembro - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 5060
Good Answers: 129
#11

Re: Neil deGrasse Tyson Advocating for NASA Funding

06/28/2016 9:34 AM

Looks like that video was deleted. Here it is from another source:

Neil deGrasse Tyson Advocating for NASA

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 11 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Bayes (1); Rixter (1); SolarEagle (2); tick-tock (1); Tornado (3); wolfie62 (3)

Previous in Forum: Which Technology Is The Most Cost Effective?   Next in Forum: Putt Putt, 1300KM

Advertisement