Previous in Forum: 240V single phase to 415V three phase converter   Next in Forum: Organic Radical Battery (ORB)
Close
Close
Close
5 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Power-User
United Kingdom - Member - New Member Hobbies - Model Rocketry - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In my house, at the loom.
Posts: 197
Good Answers: 3

Honda to Manufacture Solar Cells

12/19/2005 12:02 PM

Honda Motor Co., is planning to enter the solar cell market in 2007. They plan to build a factory at their existing plant in Kyushu, and hope to realize sales of 5 to 8 billion $40 million to $70 million) yen annually.

It's always interesting when a successful company decides to enter a completely different market. Worldwide interest in solar cells has spiked over the last few years and all the analysis that I've read suggests that this is more than a trend.

__________________
The yoke a man creates for himself by wrong-doing will breed hate in the kindliest nature . . .
Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Power-User

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 104
#1

Non Silicon?

12/20/2005 9:43 AM

Non-silicon based? Does that mean it will be the polymer types that are only 5% efficient?

Register to Reply
Friend of CR4

Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1776
Good Answers: 35
#2
In reply to #1

Re:Non Silicon?

12/20/2005 9:59 AM

Could be. Al the article says is that the process consumes half as much energy and generates 50 percent less carbon dioxide during production when compared with conventional solar cells made from silicon. I'm hard pressed to believe they'd want to process inefficient cells, but there's no discussion of output at all...

__________________
Off to take on other challenges. Good luck everybody! See you around the Interwebs.
Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 19
#3
In reply to #2

Re:Non Silicon?

12/20/2005 10:25 AM

A good friend has gotten involved in this game, and it looks like they'll be producing cells in the 7% efficiency range. Pretty old-school range to be sure, but their process lets them create large areas at low expense. The combination appears to be something the marketplace will buy. Cover the state of Arizona, hook up to the grid, and we're off to the races! (Uh, in hydrolysis-based hydrogen-fueled cars I guess...)

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 394
Good Answers: 1
#4
In reply to #3

Re:Non Silicon?

12/20/2005 10:59 AM

They have to get the cost down before photo cells can take off. It costs something like $6000 per kw to install a photovoltaic system. On average Electricity costs have risen to around $.09/kwh. Assuming the industry average of an equivalent full output of 5 hours/day, a 1 kw solar cell will produce about $180/yr worth of electricity a year, taking over 30 years for a simple payback. Given that the life expectancy of a solar cell is 20 years, it's a problem.

Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#5

Solar Cells

12/20/2005 12:21 PM

This is a good thing. This will help to make a solar array for the common man more possible, so that we may get away from the herion like addiction to oil.

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 5 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); Chris Leonard (1); halcyon_m (1); Howetwo (1); John (1)

Previous in Forum: 240V single phase to 415V three phase converter   Next in Forum: Organic Radical Battery (ORB)
You might be interested in: Photovoltaic Cells, Solar Water Heaters, Solar Mounts

Advertisement