Dear All,
TEMA does not specify the criteria and is silent on repair procedure if the drilled holes in new tube sheet exceed the limits specified in TEMA RCB 7.21
Please suggest that in case the drilled holes are more than the limits specified in TEMA what would be the remedy if the drilled holes exceeding the maximum limits specified in TEMA and exceeds 10% of the tube count and on the other hand if the drilled holes are more than the limits specified in TEMA what would be the remedy if the drilled holes exceeding the maximum limits specified in TEMA and is less than 10% of the tube count.
As per my own understanding, ASSME VIII is also silent for specifying the criteria of acceptance or rejection of newly drilled tube sheet if the drilled hole dia are exceeding the TEMA limits.
Could someone share the experience what normally exchanger manufacturer do in this case or what are the general practice adopted by Tubesheet drilling companies.
This is a common issue and there are normally results in long debates between Purchaser and Manufacturer and finally, it is a compromise due to cost and time involved.
Also, NBIC is silent on the acceptance and rejection criteria as well whereas on repair procedure (NBIC part III covers some methodology for tube sheet(S 1.2.11.6 )however, it is somewhat more generalized and do not cover how tubesheet bulging would be avoided.
also, the cost of new tube sheet is a major factor. Such acceptance/rejection criteria is even not available in API standards.
Normally, in such cases third-party inspectors recommend to plug the tube sheet holes, provided the thermal performance is acceptable to purchaser.
Could any suggest any solution or info which could lead to simplicity and suggest a repair procedure acceptable in light of code and standard with reference?
Best regards
Ahmed Attyub
Good Answers:
"Almost" Good Answers: