Previous in Forum: Detection of "Temper Embrittlement' in 2 1/4 Cr - 1 Mo Steels   Next in Forum: Metallurgy Question
Close
Close
Close
5 comments
Commentator

Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 99

Inspection of Solder on Hidden, Top-side Pins

10/12/2018 1:07 PM

We have some fairly standard 0.1" pitch, two row, shrouded, through hole headers soldered onto a thick backplane. There are tiny inspection holes along the bottom edge of the plastic body that allow an inspector to observe the top of the through hole and the pin in it. However, they are so small and at a low angle that all that can be seen is whether or not the solder came to 100% fill or greater. It cannot be seen if it reached the 50%, 75% fill level or wetting to the destination side of the pin.

What are the requirements for IPC Class 3 inspection in situations where fill cannot be seen because it's hidden by the component body? (Note: we have IPC trained inspectors and trainers on staff but this has just never been addressed in their training and we are not sure.)

Register to Reply
Pathfinder Tags: class 3 inspection solder
User-tagged by 1 user
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Comments rated to be "almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, rate them!
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: by the beach in Florida
Posts: 33280
Good Answers: 1810
#1

Re: Inspection of Solder on Hidden, Top-side Pins

10/12/2018 3:08 PM

..."Visual and X-ray inspections are not always enough to ensure the integrity of a board. To make sure that your PCB manufacturer met your requirements, ask for a cross-section analysis. This destructive technique is the best way to verify your PCB internal structure, mostly using a microscope. The test can check for various aspects, such as cracks, voids in solder joints, through-hole filling, etc."...

Regular cross-section analysis is necessary...

Class 3 = High Reliability Electronic Products

https://www.protoexpress.com/blog/ipc-class-2-vs-class-3-different-design-rules/

http://www.circuitnet.com/experts/86649.html

https://blog.jjsmanufacturing.com/ipc-standards-for-acceptability-and-why-they-matter-to-your-pcb-assembly

__________________
All living things seek to control their own destiny....this is the purpose of life
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1683
Good Answers: 144
#2

Re: Inspection of Solder on Hidden, Top-side Pins

10/12/2018 3:43 PM

I don't know what connectors you are using but I wonder if the "inspection holes along the bottom" are actually holes to allow the board wash to drain out.

I agree with what SolarEagle posted but I'll add a possible twist to it. Are you the manufacturer or consumer of the boards? If you are the manufacturer can you adjust your wave machine pressure or have your people adjust after wave manual operations to always fill the barrels to 100% or greater so the fill can be seen? The destructive sampling process SolarEagle posted requires that your process always be consistent enough for the inspected sample to be valid. Adjusting your hole size, wave pressure or manual process to allow 100% visual inspection might be easier than being able to prove that every production unit is accurately represented by the sample unit.

__________________
Few things limit our potential as much as knowing answers and setting aside questions.
Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 99
#3

Re: Inspection of Solder on Hidden, Top-side Pins

10/12/2018 3:58 PM

Ok, I'll clarify a couple things. We are a contract manufacturer; we simply build to our customer's design prints. This particular board, we outsourced because of some requirements for processes we don't do in-house. So, we are stuck to inspecting to the drawing requirement of IPC-A-610 class 3. We aren't going to section because that requirement wasn't priced into the job or required by the contract.

And, yes, the holes probably are for cleaning after processing. Even if we did these boards ourselves, one limiting factor is the presence of internal copper planes inside the board that suck up heat and limit the flow of solder. Sure, proper pre-soak would take care of that, but...

The real question is, does anyone know if this is an exception to IPC requirements for vertical fill (sect 7.3.5.1.) when you can't see the interior of the hole?

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: by the beach in Florida
Posts: 33280
Good Answers: 1810
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Inspection of Solder on Hidden, Top-side Pins

10/12/2018 5:18 PM

I think this sort of thing is stipulated in the customer requirements as in we want these solder holes visually inspected ....Short of any attachment of these instructions to the order, leaves the methodology in your hands...you only have to meet reliability requirements of a class 3 component board....and follow all other class 3 requirements...You could of course incorporate Borescope Inspection Cameras.....

http://www.ipc.org/committee/drafts/7-31b_d_610F-draft-Feb2012.pdf

__________________
All living things seek to control their own destiny....this is the purpose of life
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru
Australia - Member - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2172
Good Answers: 253
#5

Re: Inspection of Solder on Hidden, Top-side Pins

10/14/2018 1:58 AM

I'm a little rusty on IPC, but sounds like the board fails to be able to be inspected, so seek the customer's feedback. Solution might require board design change to create a plated through hole (inspectable) to verify the joint quality additional to the PTH for the connector mechanical connection.

Been away from that industry for 9 years, so IPC possibly reviewed at least twice in that time.

__________________
Just an Engineer from the land down under.
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 5 comments
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Comments rated to be "almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, rate them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

BruceFlorida (1); DavidSMullins (1); Just an Engineer (1); SolarEagle (2)

Previous in Forum: Detection of "Temper Embrittlement' in 2 1/4 Cr - 1 Mo Steels   Next in Forum: Metallurgy Question

Advertisement