Previous in Forum: Evaporative Condenser Approach   Next in Forum: Pressure Temperature Correction
Close
Close
Close
3 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Power-User
Engineering Fields - Chemical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 100

Check Valve Deceleration / Dynamic Studies

03/28/2020 3:31 PM

Old but gold posts are here that I have read & I am very thankful to those; in particular:

https://cr4.globalspec.com/thread/34933/Water-Hammer-Problems

https://cr4.globalspec.com/thread/78734/Effect-of-Check-Valve-on-Water-Hammer-Shock-Energy-Dissipation

Firstly in almost everywhere the authors above say that check valve is NOT to be fast-closing to avoid water hammer in case of say sudden pump trip, for instance. But the attached article speaks otherwise. It also says that for high head systems it's desirable to have fast-closing check valves

Now another article says that having a hole drilled through check valve or a small bypass line around check valve will leak the surge to the upstream of check valve (in case of pump trip) & therefore avoid excessive surges. Why I am reading opposite views? Check this link: http://www.nevend.info/2016/09/12/bypass-valve/

Additionaly & because this posts will solely discuss check valve in relation to transients I am requesting something, a sort of calculation to find out check valve closing time using vendor graphs. I am attaching below an image because the link from which it's extracted has ambiguous units so I tidied up a bit

I would like to see if someone has other methods or had previously calculated check valve closure times

PS: I didn't find a way uploading files in my post?

__________________
Chemical Engineers are like high Temperatures & high Pressures
Register to Reply
Pathfinder Tags: piping transient waterhammer
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: by the beach in Florida
Posts: 33392
Good Answers: 1817
#1

Re: Check Valve Deceleration / Dynamic Studies

03/28/2020 3:44 PM

..."Pump Non-Return Valves

The analysis has shown the pump non-return valves must be capable of matching a rate of flow decay of 2.45 m/s (based on nominal 400mm i.d. Ductile Iron pipework) to zero in 0.21 seconds. This equates to a flow deceleration of 11.60 m/s

With a typical flow velocity of 2.00 m/s, i.e. a deceleration rate of 1.33m/s*2, a standard swing check valve is normally capable of closure in approximately 1.5 seconds from a fully open position. As a result of the analysis a rapid acting spring assisted type check valve was recommended on all pumps.

Calculations

Initial flow rate of 2.45 m/s (8.04 fps) will decelerate to zero in 0.21 seconds
Deceleration of 11.6 m/s*2 (38.1 ft/s*2).

According to the dynamic characteristic curves below, the Surgebuster should only allow about 0.6 fps of reverse flow before closing. Projecting the curve out for the standard Swingflex indicates that it would allow about 2.6 fps of reverse flow before closing."...

With reference to the above table:

Flow Deceleration at 38 fps*2 Ξ 2.6 fps (high into ‘severe slam’)

Time to Closure:

Reverse Velocity at Time of Closure / Deceleration + Initial Time of Flow Decay = Time to Closure

2.6 fps / 38 fps*2 + 0.21s = 0.28 s

From the Joukowski equation, Pressure Surge:

h= av/g

a – pipe wave velocity
v – reverse velocity
g – gravity 9.8m/s*2 (32.2 fps*2)

h = 3714 x 2.6/32.2 = 299.9
299.9 x 0.4335 = 130.0 psi = 9.0 Bar*

https://www.mgacontrols.com/a-worked-example-check-valve-slam-prediction/

https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2017/12/epjconf_efm2017_02036.pdf

https://awwa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/j.1551-8833.2007.tb07888.x

__________________
All living things seek to control their own destiny....this is the purpose of life
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 6
#2

Re: Check Valve Deceleration / Dynamic Studies

03/30/2020 6:08 AM

I like this old school simple explanation. Anyway, thanks for posting these amazing articles.

Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 1
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Check Valve Deceleration / Dynamic Studies

05/11/2020 3:38 AM

Improper sizing of check valves results in check valve slam, a phenomenon that produces undue increase in pressure head due rapid decrease in reverse flow velocity associated with check valve closure. Check valves are placed in pipe systems to prevent flow reversal. However, most check valves require a finite time to activate after sensing flow reversal and the flow could develop significant velocity in the reverse direction before the valve is completely closed. This reverse flow velocity is brought to rest when the valve is closed completely. The rapid change in reverse flow velocity produces a rapid increase in pressure head. The reverse flow velocity at the time of complete closure depends on several factors including the pump inertia, steady state head and flow values in the pipe system, length of liquid column to the source of major wave reflection such as a reservoir, friction losses in piping systems, slope of pipeline, and wave celerity.

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 3 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

dkeegan (1); nickbor34 (1); SolarEagle (1)

Previous in Forum: Evaporative Condenser Approach   Next in Forum: Pressure Temperature Correction

Advertisement