Anti Matter

OK,I get what you are saying like putting baking soda into vinegar there will be a very strong reaction and if the mixture is right,a neutral Ph will be achieved.

The "Ph" of our universe should be neutral,but it isn't.

It is relatively positive,speaking metaphorically.Where is the Vinegar?

Perhaps we (regular matter) are actually neutral,and totally reacted with anti matter to form our neutral matter,which we call "positive."

Perhaps the original "primal womb" was composed of both forms,neither + nor - that combined to form our universe.

I am just rambling here,haven't finished my coffee,and I probably should

wait till after cup # 3 before posting anything.

The difference between matter and antimatter is handedness.

The BB is born of hubris and nothing else. The standard model and quantum mechanics has failed to stir plasma in a pot for 40 years. They both fail to explain mass and the interaction of it.

But the Parson's model has explained the periodic table and also explained all new findings without changing the model, for over one hundred years. And explains clearly why you can't tell the difference between matter and antimatter emissions. It also explains where the antimatter comes from, and why it's hard to find. And how to make it.

Not to mention the true structure of particles and atoms. And how all the properties measured are caused by confined physical motion. And how those property motions work in proportion together.

There is only one structure in this universe, and all other structures are combinations of that structure.

References, please!

Parson's Magneton 1917. Using classical mechanical motion and structure. Formed by the interaction of the EM field. This EM interaction rotates and propels particle structure for 10E+60 years, at last estimate. A high Q, no loss, rotational resonance. One pole DC resonance. The resonance is in the rotational wobble. And only certain wobbles will resonant.

Emission is intermittent DC, not AC. The same frequency emission from a one pole electron(normally high x-ray, but can be tuned up, anti-proton) or a one pole proton(normally gamma, but can be tuned down, positron), has the same effect on the absorber(receiver), and can not be distinguished.

The Parson model only requires two particles for the periodic table. This model was upgraded and re-modeled about 20 years ago, to help solve the toroidal plasma problems for fission. The standard model and quantum mechanics had failed to solve it. It verified the periodic table, also predicting new isotopes and line spectra which were later verified. And not predicted by the standard model and quantum mechanics.

But, this model also explained why you can't spin dirty plasma(mixed charge and mixed mass) in a toroid.

Lightening gives us very dirty plasma, giving current multiple directions and even a little anti-matter on the side. Try steering and stirring lightening in a toroid.

We have been controlling pristine, clean, room temp plasma for years. Electricity.

Please provide a reference link to the Parson's model.I would like to see it.Thanks.

One can download the original in PDF "The Magneton Theory Of The structure Of The Atom" 1915. This model was introduced before the discovery of the neutron.

Some of the people working on the torus, and others dissatisfied with present theory, and several Christian scientists re-evaluated the model a few decades back. They had a site called commonsensescience.net, but I see no activity for several years now. I'm assuming due to health. Go to site and the top resources tab, click on newsletter and articles, Start at the previous articles, vol 1 down at the bottom to read the history of this. It's a great read.

It also reviews some previous discoveries, and lots of info which was un-familiar.

And a plausible physical explanation of gravity. No space-time needed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toroidal_ring_model

Handedness is a real puzzle. On one hand, there seems to be a symmetry, a balance, of the equal number of L and R spins. Yet at the same time we have this equal number of spins, almost all the energy and mass in creation is right handed spins. And then it bounces back........for almost all energy exchange and transfer.....is thru left handed spins.

Gives one something to ponder. What are the laws of handedness? This huge affect of spin?

Handedness might have an unlimited range and an instant response time. A response where time and distance have no effect. Entanglement. Entanglement might be the L, R spin number symmetry.

Could particle handedness be the solution for such mysteries?

The solution will turn out to be simple and physical, just like the pyramids mystery did.

I thought there was still much argument about the pyramids--like the aggregate being uniformly distributed in the blocks,instead of in layers like in the quarry.

This suggests a form of concrete.

That could explain the extremely close fit of all the blocks.

Form lines could have been erased.

Ancient concrete was far superior than what we have today.

How did they light up the interior of the pyramids to work?There are no carbon traces to indicate a fuel was used.

This theory is dismissed,because there is a lot of ego equity and careers invested in what is popular;Like the Sphinx for instance, and the Brontosaurus with the wrong head for many years.

I can't remember if it was nova or natgeo...but the construction was done with a spiral INTERIOR ramp. And the large empty halls were used for large counter weights, for raising cap stones. I'm sure one can find the video on youtube.

Block and tackle did all the work. I would have loved to see those weights slide down those corridors.

How did they see what they were doing?

No traces of carbon from fossil fuels was found in the stones inside.That means no candles,torches,or fires.Did the do all of this work in the dark?

Primitive batteries have been found,so who knows what technology they might have had.

And this does not explain the uniform dispersion of aggregate (Shells) in the blocks.In the quarry,they are deposited in layers naturally.

It was built in the open sunlight. Light was not needed until the finish work. What light was needed...was reflected into the structure.

Watch the video.