Previous in Forum: DAQ and DCS   Next in Forum: FT'S
Close
Close
Close
3 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Anonymous Poster

Vision Sensor

12/10/2007 4:29 AM

hello...........

currently we are working on d project of "automatic inspection of wax parts" .

the single part size is about 50*50mm and about 6 parts can be produced at a

time .

I want to know about that vision sensors are capable of to inspect the multi wax parts at a time or it should be done one by one.

Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Technical Fields - Architecture - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Hobbies - Hunting - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Clemson, South Carolina
Posts: 1722
Good Answers: 18
#1

Re: Vision Sensor

12/10/2007 11:08 AM

National Instruments has done a lot of work in this area. Check 'em out.

__________________
We have met the enemy and he is us . . . Walt Kelly
Reply
Guru
Canada - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 632
Good Answers: 11
#2

Re: Vision Sensor

12/10/2007 10:56 PM

It all depends on what you need to inspect.

One part at a time is generally better.

Most of the hard work is to be done in the lighting design, then everything is easier to analyse when your features stand out.

Take a look at Cognex if your needs are not too complicated.

__________________
''What the hell has my a** got to do with magic?" Don Quixote
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Kingman, AZ
Posts: 110
Good Answers: 3
#3

Re: Vision Sensor

12/11/2007 10:07 AM

Yes, I agree with checking out Cognex. They bought another visual sensing company out of Georgia several years back called, I believe DVT. Between the 2 brands they can provide alot of options. The DVT brand had more capability, but its one drawback vs. the Cognex brand was the more memory intensive the application the slower it worked.

It works on the principle of taking a snapshot of what you consider ideal, then allows you to put tolerance borders around the object to be inspected. As each part passes, it will compare to the ideal. In order to maintain speed, you can blank out parts of the object not needed and only keep what provides value in your inspections. The Cognex brand is less capable, but is not so affected by memory use.

Reply
Reply to Forum Thread 3 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Bill (1); gigaconcept.com (1); Sonave Sunsets (1)

Previous in Forum: DAQ and DCS   Next in Forum: FT'S

Advertisement