Mind Control via slf audio?

Well... I dunno...

Patent owner has a kookscience.com Page. Whilst not an outright indictment, this indicates to me a jaundiced eye may be in order.

https://hatch.kookscience.com/wiki/Hendricus_G._Loos

I’m not getting too wound up about 5G. I will certainly be watching this thread for other opinions.

I agree, this article is pure fake science.

To be fair to the late Hendricus G. Loos, this patent has nothing to do with 5G communication. This patent uses modulated wind and acoustics directed into a subject's face to produce the cited physiologic effects. As anyone who has had a glaucoma testing machine puff air into their eye knows, some strategically placed winds are annoying. Nothing in the patent nor the brief initial "Voice to Skull..." web-based article links this acoustically driven observation to 5G technology.

Neither could I find any interlace between the subject patent and this voice to skull.

I guess the old snake oil sales mantra come along here: “If you can’t dazzle ‘em with brilliance then baffle ‘em with... “ can’t remember the zinger, is it ‘baloney’?

Addicted to screens....a different kind of mind control

You must not be married.

Only the divorced are allowed to discuss that form of mind control.

I've been a proud member of the club for 14 years.

She was defective so I returned her and asked for a full refund. Guess how that turned out.

At least you aren't bitter about it, as was the often lamented case of our resident tire burner from Minot.

To be honest, I feel sorry for her. She'll never comprehend or feel real happiness. I really wish her the best of luck with her life, as it is.

Quack quack quack!

Did anybody check this guys patents?????????Many of his patents are on mind control. And meaningless to laymen. Have any of his patents ever been commercialized.

And a patent does not define the product. Patent attorneys write patents to be marginally useful to "someone well schooled in the art." Patents mean NOTHING, unless you are willing to hire an $$$ attorney to defend them.

Some forms of mind control are already in use, I'm sure. But I doubt this guy had anything to do with them.

(Sorry for repeating others, slow typist.)

The most primitive mind control, and still in effect is the female of the species,all species,including,and especially humans.

Wars have been fought,people have been killed,imprisoned, tortured,and the list goes on.

On another level,there are insects that take over the brains of other insects and make them do their bidding.There are even fungi that do the same.

So mind control is not new.

To think that it is not now possible with technology is naive,IMHO.

There is a method of transmitting sound that is only heard by the target,a very small beam that can be precisely aimed.

Combine this tech with binaural beats, and you may have a source of control,pain management or pain generation.

Perhaps this is the mysterious source of all the headaches and brain damage of embassy workers:A binaural beat that resonates within the skull,like an opera singer breaking a glass,could,theoretically,cause brain damage.

But,then again,I am just a dumb arse redneck,what do I know?

The physiology of SLF audio has been validated.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=agivusZEpB0

There you have it folks.

Irrefutable proof that the television does, indeed, alter the mentality of viewers.

My antenna handbook safety chapter does say that the human body absorbs rf the best at about the frequency of good old channel two.

Nikola Tesla said: "If you want to find the secrets of the universe,think in terms of energy,frequency and vibration."

It all boils down to I don't mind and you don't matter!

5G they can't even get coverage with 3G so it may be a problem for city dwellers but not us boonies!

I’ll get the lab boys to run this SLF audio signal through the LynDoor SAMWICH and see if functionality is altered.

LynDoor SAMWICH device

I am sort of doubting any positive results, but you never know. Besides,we are hoping the confounded thing does something useful.

A good reference for this discussion here:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9306739/

And here:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355762562_Resonant_frequencies_of_a_human_brain_skull_and_head

Why would variations in air pressure be used instead of the specific rf resonant response of the human nervous system?
It seems validating and monitoring rf resonant response would be much more straight forward than slf acoustic signals. Especially when investigating "silent talk" technology.
It appears rf resonant response would have more potential for both silent communication, surveillance, and weaponization than slf acoustic.
I had first considered this back in the 70's after being dressed down for unintentional interference in experiments using rf to detect the presence of humans outside the wire on a firebase. I can only imagine where that technology went.
Later I considered the possibility of using rf resonant response as a means of remotely monitoring the three time differentiated functions of a human heart beat, but decided this stuff was just too darn dangerous to think about.

Now it occurs to me we cannot protect ourselves against technologies we are unwilling to consider.

Here is an earlier thread related to Radio Frequency Response of The Human Nervous System.
https://cr4.globalspec.com/thread/11748/Affect-of-Resonant-Response-on-The-Human-Nervous-System