Previous in Forum: Online Leak Sealing  
Close
Close
Close
2 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Participant

Join Date: May 2026
Posts: 4

A Simple Tolerance Change That Can Significantly Reduce Manufacturing Cost

05/11/2026 5:28 AM

In many projects, one of the biggest cost drivers is unnecessarily tight tolerances.

For example, changing a machining tolerance from ±0.005 mm to ±0.02 mm can often reduce cycle time and cost substantially, while still meeting all functional requirements.

Other practical DFM strategies that usually help:

  • Use standard materials and stock sizes
  • Avoid unnecessary cosmetic surface finishes
  • Reduce deep cavities and very thin walls
  • Select the most appropriate manufacturing process

What design changes have helped you reduce manufacturing cost the most?

Register to Reply
Pathfinder Tags: CNCMachining
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: About 4000 miles from the center of the earth (+/-100 mi)
Posts: 9912
Good Answers: 1141
#1

Re: A Simple Tolerance Change That Can Significantly Reduce Manufacturing Cost

05/11/2026 3:31 PM

It reminds me, long, long ago, I was working as a student intern in a drafting shop. I labeled a quarter-inch hole 0.25000". One of the engineers there pointed out to me that this implied precision to the machinist in the shop, and if he took it literally, it would be expensive to make the part.

Live and learn...

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru
Australia - Member - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2181
Good Answers: 255
#2

Re: A Simple Tolerance Change That Can Significantly Reduce Manufacturing Cost

05/26/2026 7:38 AM

We repeatedly determined our process capability and designed mating parts so that tolerances would be achievable and so that fit was always possible.

We developed a means to fit our parts into rectangular receiving holes in material of varied thickness and hole tolerance by simply putting a taper on the compressed clip rather than try to get exact thickness fit. No rattle, ever. Auto industry worldwide was using this when GFC happened and we closed.

DFMA principles to reduce component count by combining items that could be common material (injection moulding).

Interchangeable tools in shop all same "thickness" so that machine clamping never had to be adjusted. Saved time on EVERY tool changeover. We ran 25 machines with typically 10 changes per day.

"Crush ribs" on mating parts so that only small material volumes were needed to be deformed to achieve fit.

Corner radius ALARP to eliminate/reduce stress focus on inside corners of parts. Easier to machine.

Lots of other things associated to JIT, SMED, KANBAN etc.

Gee I miss those times.

__________________
Just an Engineer from the land down under.
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 2 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!

Previous in Forum: Online Leak Sealing  

Advertisement