Previous in Forum: Changing user name   Next in Forum: Enlargeable Avatars
Close
Close
Close
3 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Anonymous Poster

innapropriate post

02/06/2008 2:56 PM

good day, it cannot be denied this is a free for all of topics and philosphies around the mechanical bio or electrical activity of ancient and modern life and lifestyles.

my last word forms the reason for my feeling the rant by Miss Kate re todays are hamburgs... is not in my view a place for that rant to be posted.

i too have strong feelings about the rights of animals to be cared for as work partners sources of intellectual aid and when or where nescessary as a food supply. the same care and concern for the health existence goes for the downtroden vegetable.

i repeat it is beneath the pale to allow this form of anti-animal use rant to occur in this very useful sites blog opages.

what the woman is doing in my view is using C4R to "spread the word"about animal abuse without considering the position that what she and others having the same mindsets are doing is creating a ogilarchic community intent on denying access to the benefits offered to the rest of humanity and the worlds animals dependent on consumption of items anathema their philosophy's creed

'da ber

Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Anonymous Poster
#1

Re: innapropriate post

02/06/2008 3:19 PM

Did you not read the intro to Kate's blog? Pull your head out and take it for what it's worth!

Reply
8
Friend of CR4

Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1776
Good Answers: 35
#2

Re: inappropriate post

02/06/2008 4:22 PM

Maybe you should read her blog a little more closely:

Please note: This is a controversial blog where I try to present interesting topics that are controversial. Just because I choose to write about these particular controversies does not always mean that I am taking a side. I just want to let people know what is being said.

That said, do you believe that asking questions about how our food is produced automatically makes one "anti-animal use" and in general some form of "environmental wacko"? If so, wow...

Me, I love steak, I'm a big fan of foie gras and caviar, but there are serious environmental and abusive traits associated with each of those products. Have I stopped eating them, no. Do I look for producers who grow and harvest sustainably? You betcha. The act of looking closely at our food, how it is raised and the environmental results of its production, is extremely important.

If I understand your post correctly in terms of:

without considering the position that what she and others having the same mindsets are doing is creating a ogilarchic community intent on denying access to the benefits offered to the rest of humanity and the worlds animals dependent on consumption of items anathema their philosophy's creed.

you seem to be saying that by questioning how food is produced, the US risks dooming the rest of the world's population to starvation, or at the very least deprivation. First, many places throughout the world already suffer deprivation for many reasons, econmonic, environmental, political, etc. Changing US food production likely will not negatively impact this. Secondly, there are many who believe exactly the opposite of what you are expressing - that the US factory farm system strains resources, promotes pollution, endangers the food supply, and helps to create food which may be inherently unhealthy.

Again, has all of this knowledge stopped me from eating meat and using animal products. Nope. But, it has made me reconsider where my food comes from and to look for better and safer avenues of production. I like to buy local foods from farmers I know, but does that mean they aren't using hazardous chemicals in their fields, nope. It does mean, though, that the food I am purchasing hasn't been trucked across the country and sprayed with additional chemicals so that it maintains a fresh appearance. When possible, I buy locally produced "organic" meats, but I don't always want to pay $7.99 a lb. for a pork loin when I can get it in the local supermarket for $1.99.

I'm lucky, I have choices. Many people in the world do not. But does that mean I should take no concern about what I eat, how its produced or where it comes from? Not on your life; and certainly not on mine!

__________________
Off to take on other challenges. Good luck everybody! See you around the Interwebs.
Reply Good Answer (Score 8)
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Israel
Posts: 2968
Good Answers: 24
#3
In reply to #2

Re: inappropriate post

02/06/2008 5:08 PM

It seems that these days, environmental issues have become so urgent, and becoming more so with the "inevitable" population growth, that somewhat "aggressive" public notification is called for.

Bold statements concerning our communal health are not out of place because most of us seem so indifferent about the immediate and long future.

That is our legacy, as people who already enjoyed most of our lives here on earth, to pass-on to the next generation, who will have the additional burden of trying not just to save themselves, but many other species in distress.

We have become "Alfa-Of-Alfas" as a species on this earth, and it is our moral and practical responsibility, no less.

No one will do it for us. Don't wait for aliens. It's now, or very soon, never.

Reply
Reply to Forum Thread 3 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); Chris Leonard (1); Yuval (1)

Previous in Forum: Changing user name   Next in Forum: Enlargeable Avatars

Advertisement