Previous in Forum: Rate Of CRCA MS Sheet   Next in Forum: need of gear pump (european leader)
Close
Close
Close
9 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Active Contributor

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 11

Heat Duty Requirement

02/12/2008 8:38 AM

I have a steel storage container I wish to heat. Interior needs to be minimum 65F. Size 8'x8'x10'. Construction: 1008-1010 steel 3/16". If I spec. for worst case -10F exterior (75F rise), how big should heater be? Heater will NOT draw outside air, only re-circ. interior. Need Kw estimate for electric heat.

NOTE: Please show work!! Advanced thermo/heat transfer equations appreciated!

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#1

Re: Heat Duty Requirement

02/12/2008 10:04 AM

With what is the container insulated, and at what thickness?

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 11
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Heat Duty Requirement

02/12/2008 1:14 PM

No insulation, steel only

Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#3

Re: Heat Duty Requirement

02/13/2008 3:18 AM

I would need to know in what period of time you wish to heat the container up in? and are you insulating the container.

You could put a 3kw heater in a container and it would eventually get up to 65F depending on the insulation.

Any information, please come back to me at andy@cds-concrete.com

Best Regards

Andy Hall

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Stoke-on-Trent, UK
Posts: 4496
Good Answers: 137
#4

Re: Heat Duty Requirement

02/13/2008 5:45 AM

In steady state the resistance of the steel to heat flow is negligible, and it's limited by convection heat flow from inside air to inside of box in series with outside of box to outside air. Steel wall is at average temperature so ΔT for both is 37.5°F.

To estimate heat flow, take analogy of domestic radiator, which outputs ~ 1 kW/m2 with hot water at 180°F and room 70°F ie ΔT 110°F. Heat flow by natural convection varies as ΔT1.25, (might be something like forced convection inside, but it's near enough for an estimate).

So heat flow = (37.5/110)1.25*1 kW/m2 = 0.26 kW/m2. Taking total area for a bit of safety (heat loss lower from top and bottom) = 448 ft2 = 42 m2 giving 10.8 kW.

You could add a margin if you want, for safety and warm-up from cold.

Cheers.......Codey

__________________
Give masochists a fair crack of the whip
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Active Contributor

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 11
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Heat Duty Requirement

02/13/2008 8:47 AM

This looks very close to another sources calculation of 9.86 Kw (Ruffneck Heater Mfg.). I currently have a convective 3 Kw in there and can only get about a 25 degree F delta. The heater has 2 fin/tube radiant heater elements, each abot 3 feet long, 1.5 inch diameter, with square Al fins 4 inch square. Not sure what temp. it is at for setpoint.

Question: If I put forced air over these elements, can I improve the 25 degree delta? Right now they just sit there, purely convective.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Stoke-on-Trent, UK
Posts: 4496
Good Answers: 137
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Heat Duty Requirement

02/13/2008 9:14 AM

No, presumably you have the thermostat (if it has one) turned right up so it's on continuously. In that case it's putting out 3kW and forcing air over it won't increase this.

Codey

__________________
Give masochists a fair crack of the whip
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Eastern Kansas USA
Posts: 1503
Good Answers: 128
#7

Re: Heat Duty Requirement

02/13/2008 12:53 PM

dsdynamics,

This application saddens me, because of lousy energy efficiency. Any way you can add a second skin or add insulation will greatly improve the efficiency and utility of your cabinet. This is true, even if only to some surfaces, such as back, sides, and top.

Which is more expensive--adding insulation once or adding energy all the time? At $0.07 per kWh, with a heat loss decreased to 1/3 by insulating back sides and top, you are saving about 6-7kWh per hour or approximately $11.00 per day. How long will the payback be compared to a larger circuit, a new heater, and the daily energy bill?

Regards--JMM

Register to Reply
Power-User
Technical Fields - Education - New Member Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 367
Good Answers: 1
#8

Re: Heat Duty Requirement

02/13/2008 4:11 PM

Nobody asked what is stored inside? Oil - water - sand - explosive powder or???

Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 11
#9
In reply to #8

Re: Heat Duty Requirement

02/14/2008 11:04 PM

This is good question, but perhaps not germaine? I am very restricted

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 9 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); Codemaster (2); dsdynamics (3); jmueller (1); PWSlack (1); southern123 (1)

Previous in Forum: Rate Of CRCA MS Sheet   Next in Forum: need of gear pump (european leader)

Advertisement