Previous in Forum: Pressure Levels of Steam Generation and Distribution   Next in Forum: What is IR Plastic Welding?
Close
Close
Close
5 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Active Contributor

Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 15

Turbine Control: Ion Exchange vs. Selexsorb

03/05/2008 2:37 AM

hi everyone,

can anyone please tell me what is more effective for turbine control application? ion exchange or selexsorb? what is the factor to consider to choose any of them into the system. thank you.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Commentator

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Caribbean
Posts: 79
Good Answers: 2
#1

Re: Turbine Control: Ion Exchange vs. Selexsorb

03/06/2008 8:03 AM

what type of turbines are you controlling??

__________________
Learn more, Do more , Be more
Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 15
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Turbine Control: Ion Exchange vs. Selexsorb

03/06/2008 8:12 PM

hi, it is steam turbine..thank you for the reply...

Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Caribbean
Posts: 79
Good Answers: 2
#3
In reply to #1

Re: Turbine Control: Ion Exchange vs. Selexsorb

03/06/2008 8:31 PM

Well I have been in the turbine control busines sfor the last 30 years.

Unfortunately the sizes of turbines I have been controlling are all in the 80 to 300 MW range driving pelectric generators.

What is your steam turbine driving?

__________________
Learn more, Do more , Be more
Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Systems Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Model Rocketry - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Long.92E,Lat.26N
Posts: 1336
Good Answers: 14
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Turbine Control: Ion Exchange vs. Selexsorb

03/07/2008 9:21 PM

Ion Exchange vs Selexsorb:

Relates to removal of corrosion-inducing and scale forming metal ions from boiler feed water

Ion Exchange isGeneric name.

Selexsorb =somebody's registered brand name

Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1
#5

Re: Turbine Control: Ion Exchange vs. Selexsorb

03/09/2008 1:06 AM

Ion Exchange in general is a much safer technology for steam turbine control systems. Selexsorb has two problems. It has a high percentage of sub-micron, abrasive material that can cause servo abrasion and will release metals that can react with degraded phosphate ester fluid to cause metallic deposits. This will cause valve sticking and failures, requiring you to change out the fluid and perform a system flush. The biggest concerns with ion exchange filters are manufacturing quality. The filters need to be relatively rupture proof (>100PSI) to avoid getting resin in your system. If you find a good IX technology, it will add years/decades of life onto phosphate ester fluids if you exercise good maintenance practices.

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 5 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

CLS (1); djacob (2); dsyamiqh (1); MUKULMAHANT (1)

Previous in Forum: Pressure Levels of Steam Generation and Distribution   Next in Forum: What is IR Plastic Welding?

Advertisement