can anyone please tell me what is more effective for turbine control application? ion exchange or selexsorb? what is the factor to consider to choose any of them into the system. thank you.
Ion Exchange in general is a much safer technology for steam turbine control systems. Selexsorb has two problems. It has a high percentage of sub-micron, abrasive material that can cause servo abrasion and will release metals that can react with degraded phosphate ester fluid to cause metallic deposits. This will cause valve sticking and failures, requiring you to change out the fluid and perform a system flush. The biggest concerns with ion exchange filters are manufacturing quality. The filters need to be relatively rupture proof (>100PSI) to avoid getting resin in your system. If you find a good IX technology, it will add years/decades of life onto phosphate ester fluids if you exercise good maintenance practices.