Previous in Forum: help   Next in Forum: Frozen Plastic Water Pipe
Close
Close
Close
10 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Participant

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4

Transfer Switch time Delay

03/07/2008 10:31 AM

Hi, Recenetly we have had a new generator installed which we exercise for one hour once a week. The problem is that the transfer switch for the generator has too long of a delay. This is causing problem with our network server. Everytime the generator goes off or comes on the computer network goes off. This didn't happen with the old emergency generator setup. I am thinking about changing the time delay but I would like to know if there is a standard minimum time delay setting. Or maybe someone can suggest a solution to the problem.

Thanks

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Guru
Canada - Member - Our strength is our diversity

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 1024
Good Answers: 40
#1

Re: Transfer Switch time Delay

03/07/2008 11:19 AM

Do you have a UPS for your server?

The time delay for switching power supplies depends on all the loads. You do not want to have a positive spike added onto the positive cycle of the old power source. This could cause an overvoltage condition with lots of sparks and fire. It also depends if there are any motors or capacitive loads being fed. When a motor loses power it can become a generator while it loses speed, feeding power back to the source. You may have to wait until it reduces speed enough to avoid an over voltage condition.

A delay could also be required to get the generator up to speed, or synchronized.

Whoever installed the generator should have done all these calculations. Changing the delay could have devastating effects as well as void any warranties. Contact the installer, or get a better UPS and battery back-up for the server to handle the delay.

__________________
Perfection is a subjective and abstract concept.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sitting directly behind my keyboard in Albuquerque - USA
Posts: 592
Good Answers: 19
#2

Re: Transfer Switch time Delay

03/08/2008 3:25 AM

There are 'make before break' transfer switches, however, the generator controls must be capable of auto synchronization to the utility before transfer. The other way to exercise the generator, done once a week in hospitals, is to do it without actual transfer. There should be a setting on the transfer switch for "exercise" without transfer where the generator starts and runs no load just to check voltage and speed and for leaks. Load test can be set up for once a month. Once a week is too much.

__________________
If it eats, it's going to be trouble!
Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 50.390866N, 8.884827E
Posts: 17996
Good Answers: 200
#3

Re: Transfer Switch time Delay

03/08/2008 3:32 AM

You need to have at least a small UPS system for each important PC (or a big one for all of them!), there is no way round this at all if the mains just drops off, there will be no time for a Sync phase and changeover.....

This smacks of lack of knowledge/planning.....the UPS is the ONLY way to correct this situation and should have been planned from day 1....

__________________
"What others say about you reveals more about them, than it does you." Anon.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 266
Good Answers: 21
#4

Re: Transfer Switch time Delay

03/08/2008 11:53 PM

As others point out in this thread, you certainly should have a UPS serving critical computer loads. If you have one make sure it's working correctly or even inadvertantly left in bypass. Unless you have a closed transition switch (make before break) you will have momentary loss of power during transfer. The ASCO switches are about the fastest and still, by nature of design, you will get an average open time of 30-35ms depending on the size of the ATS.

You need to determine specifically what type of ATS you have. Over the past several years there have been more and more Delay Transition Transfer Switches sold. Some engineers have been going with this style, simply because it's easier to deal with the current inrush you get from fast out-of-phase switching going hot to hot. If you have a DTTS you can minimize the open delay time but if you have much rotating motor load or tranformer load you'll need to be careful.

It is typically not a good idea to run your gen unloaded for excercise periods. I've seen plenty of engines weeping and drooling oil all over from being wet stacked due to this.

Anyway, check your switch out and respond back here with better specifics. Determine who, what, etc. ASCO, Zenith, Russel, Onan... What catalog number etc and we'll know whether you can do anything.

__________________
Speed doesn't kill. Sudden stops, brick walls, and old ladies in Buicks do.
Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 50.390866N, 8.884827E
Posts: 17996
Good Answers: 200
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Transfer Switch time Delay

03/09/2008 8:32 AM

The main problem as I see it that with "Hot Swop", he needs to know in advance when a power failure is going to happen, how will he get this info??? From God?

Therefore a UPS is the only method that will work properly....

__________________
"What others say about you reveals more about them, than it does you." Anon.
Register to Reply
2
Power-User

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 266
Good Answers: 21
#7
In reply to #5

Re: Transfer Switch time Delay

03/10/2008 1:29 PM

Yes, a UPS is definitely needed for critical loads, regardless of type of switching. Who knows what the OP originally had or has now...I certainly don't.

I have been in quite a few meetings where a bright young engineer asked..."but how does the CTTS anticipate power loss?" Never failed to amuse me.

A closed transition switch has a dual operator design. On power loss the "normal" power poles will be operated first to open and then, as soon as the alternate source is available, the "emergency" poles will operated to close. Just a plain ol' open transition.

In a hot-hot transfer, either due to testing or re-transfer, the majority of dedicated CTTS controllers use passive sync which just simply relies on slip rate to bring it in phase and minimal difference of phase potential to allow transfer. When conditions are met the open poles close in and immediately the other poles roll open. This method has been thoroughly proven to work reliably once the gen is set where it should be.

Also...in response to Hughes838...here rather than make another response... a "form c" contact arrangement is, to the best of my knowledge, always considered an open switch. Maybe I have just never heard it referred to the other way. Regarding transfer speed...100ms overlap time would be way way too long. I've tested hundreds upon hundreds of switches for specific timing for agencies like the FAA, both open transition and closed transition. An open transition unit typically starts at about 20ms on little switches like 150a/260a. 400a units are about 30ms. 3000a and 4000a switches are about 35ms source to source. Never saw one hit 40ms. Which is why in-phase permissive and even switching with selective load control is important. Closed transition overlap times are seen to be typically a cycle or a bit more...18-20ms. Myself, I've never left an overlap that extends out to more than a couple of cycles as measured on the scope. From a system standpoint it's important to stagger all switching. I've seen some wicked crashes with breakers tripping all over because people went in afterwards and reset everything to transfer at the same time. Multiple parallel paths and different circuit impedances does for terrific current flow. I've also seen VFDs do very ugly things to these systems, due to the reflected ringing back.

__________________
Speed doesn't kill. Sudden stops, brick walls, and old ladies in Buicks do.
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 50.390866N, 8.884827E
Posts: 17996
Good Answers: 200
#8
In reply to #7

Re: Transfer Switch time Delay

03/10/2008 2:17 PM

Good post, shows in depth knowledge of the complete problem. I have given you a GA.

__________________
"What others say about you reveals more about them, than it does you." Anon.
Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 59
#6

Re: Transfer Switch time Delay

03/09/2008 12:49 PM

Good morning,

When your power goes away (blackout) you will need a UPS to carry your servers, because it takes time for the generator to start and come up to speed and voltage (at least 10 -15 seconds). Now when the power comes back choose a closed transition (which is what you must have had on your old system) switch and you will never know the generator is off line when the power is restored. This is like a form "C" contact i.e. make before break and vice versa. The time delay is probably only for keeping the generator running after the power comes back to insure that it is steady. Once the switch is initiated it is FAST (like 100 ms)! When you exercise your unit, closed transition will always occur because you are starting the generator before making the change - and of course when the unit switches back it's the same thing. Good luck.

Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - RC Aircraft - New Member Hobbies - Automotive Performance - New Member Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fort Lauderdale Florida
Posts: 5708
Good Answers: 123
#9

Re: Transfer Switch time Delay

04/03/2008 10:50 PM

Switchman certainly has the answers you need for your problem. I would like to add this though. There was a building built near the fire station where I work. The standard procedure for us is to watch the building details while under construction. The company that was going to use this building was a cell phone service. They built their system to run on rooms full of batteries. Then they used the power company to maintain the charge in the batteries. Their generator was used as backup to charge the batteries. In effect a very large UPS. I do not know what electrical demands your computer system requires, but I would think that for most personal computers a UPS has the added benefit of surge and brown out protection. Even if switchman could talk you through the transfer switch adjustments, UPSs are cheap insurance. Good luck.

__________________
Bob
Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 50.390866N, 8.884827E
Posts: 17996
Good Answers: 200
#10
In reply to #9

Re: Transfer Switch time Delay

04/04/2008 5:22 AM

Good Post BobC.

------------------

To the original poster, I would just like to add the following to various posts already made on this blog:-

I would just like to add :-

1)that any electronic designed to switch seamlessly from mains to inverter and back, no matter how well designed, may still cause some nasty transients to be produced that could still do nasty things to a running PC.......do not take this risk....they are also usually far more expensive.....

2) If the mains just drops off, there is NO electronics that can handle that transfer in any good manner....no matter what the literature says.....!

3) The mains ---> charger ---> Battery ---> inverter ---> mains Voltage. Is still the best and simplest manner as no particularly high technical quality electronics are required and you are protected from any mains transients as mentioned by others, a further plus.

4) the batteries are "worked" all the time (good for the batteries lifespan) and you can even switch off the mains input from time to time to deplete the battery and then let it charge again. The only requirement here is for a charger that NEVER over charges the batteries under any circumstance.....

I fail to understand why you (seem to be) set on the other sort of UPS with all its possible problems, what are your imagined benefits from this sort? Perhaps we can answer that better......

__________________
"What others say about you reveals more about them, than it does you." Anon.
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 10 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Andy Germany (4); bob c (1); hughes838 (1); PetroPower (1); Switchman (2); techno (1)

Previous in Forum: help   Next in Forum: Frozen Plastic Water Pipe

Advertisement