Previous in Forum: Fluid Damper System for a PC Steering Wheel   Next in Forum: Global Warming Twist
Close
Close
Close
5 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Anonymous Poster

Big Bang Physics

08/13/2006 10:00 AM

Imdad Mansoor.S writes:
The Big Bang formed both planets and asteroids. All of the planets are nearly round in shape, but many of the asteroids are not. Why is this?

Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Engineering Fields - Aerospace Engineering - Retired South Africa - Member - The Rainbow-nation Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Relativity & Cosmology Popular Science - Cosmology - The Big Picture!

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
Posts: 3804
Good Answers: 69
#1

Re: Big Bang Physics

08/13/2006 10:42 AM

Imdad Mansoor.S wrote: "The Big Bang formed both planets and asteroids. All of the planets are nearly round in shape, but many of the asteroids are not. Why is this?"

Well, planets and asteroids are about as far away from Big Bang Physics as you can get! They presumably formed billions of years after the BB. Your actual question is about formation of the solar system, some 5 billion years ago.

The short (and rough) answer is: all the planets presumably started out as so-called "planetisimals", somewhat like the asteroids today – too small to have large gravity on their own, leaving them odd-shaped. But, combined they had enough gravity to clump together and form fairly rounded planets and moons, due to the larger own gravity. Due to gravitational heating, most planets and moons had liquid mantles, at least for some part of their history. It is thought that the giant planet Jupiter prevented a normal planet to form at the distance of the main asteroid belt and left many planetesimals.

For the long answer, start by reading this internet link:http://stardate.org/resources/ssguide/planet_ form.html

__________________
"Perplexity is the beginning of knowledge." -- Kahlil Gibran
Reply
Associate
Indonesia - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Corenda, Situmekar, Cisitu, Sumedang, West Java, Indonesia, Asia, Earth, Solar System, Milky Way, Universe.
Posts: 38
Good Answers: 1
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Big Bang Physics

08/13/2006 11:27 PM

I ever heard someone founded such formulation of number series, showing that the planets of our solar system are right in its place. However, according to his series, there is a 'lost' planet right in the position of asteroid belt. He then proposed that the belt was a planet and somehow broken into pieces that we called it asteroids. Need correction and further suggestion.

__________________
Have you imagine how the astronauts cry out there? No tear drops!!
Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Aerospace Engineering - Retired South Africa - Member - The Rainbow-nation Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Relativity & Cosmology Popular Science - Cosmology - The Big Picture!

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
Posts: 3804
Good Answers: 69
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Big Bang Physics

08/14/2006 2:48 AM

It is called the "Titius-Bode law of planetary spacing". You can read my engineering summary in a pdf download from this page: http://www.einsteins-theory-of-relativity-4enginee rs.com/articles.html

__________________
"Perplexity is the beginning of knowledge." -- Kahlil Gibran
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 129
#4

Planets and Asteroids

08/20/2006 2:59 PM

My son told me (I was working at the time, so couldn't check his source myself) that a Planet has just been defined as a body orbiting the Sun whose own mass/gravity is sufficient to make its shape approximately spherical. As a result, Ceres the largest Asteroid (or ex-asteroid) has been upgraded to planetary status. This look like begging the question - a planet is round because if it's not round it's not a planet - but also answers it. Gravity will pull a planet into shape but an asteroid's gravity isn't strong enough to do so if it is knocked out of shape by a collision.

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#5
In reply to #4

Re:Planets and Asteroids

08/22/2006 10:32 PM

Gravity is proportional to diameter cubed, right? All other things being equal? So a planet that's twice as wide as another would have eight times the gravity.

Reply
Reply to Forum Thread 5 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); eka_subyantara (1); John77 (1); Jorrie (2)

Previous in Forum: Fluid Damper System for a PC Steering Wheel   Next in Forum: Global Warming Twist

Advertisement