Okay, in one corner we have Roger Pink, great thinker and CR4 citizen, representing the Pro Global Warming stance.
In the other corner we have the Mystery Guest X, venerable and valiant in his thinking, representing the Anti-Global Warming viewpoint.
The rules are simple. No hitting under the belt. Keep each blow simple and direct. Stay within the upper body.
I'll be refereeing this match and proving a blow-by-blow account for all you folk in radio land. Points will be awarded as I see fit and I will call any play that violates the sanctity of the spirit of good argumentation.
I will ask the crowd to refrain from jumping in the ring, at least until the very end where we will follow this match with free-for-all mud wrestling match with common sense tied behind your backs.
Remember to keep your claims concise and to the point. I would prefer a one or two sentence statement and by all means cite references!
This match will consist of series of positing a claim followed by a rebuttal. Each candidate will be allowed one follow-up post to address his candidate's post. I'll score each set at the end of the 4-post spat.
After the final rebuttal, the other candidate will make a claim and the process will continue back and forth until the final round's bell sounds.
To make it easier for me, which is what really counts here, please number your posts and replies with a 1 for the first set, then 2 for the next set in the Title of each post. So, the first four posts will have a 1 in their title, then the next four posts should have a 2... and so on...
I retain the right to deduct points for chronic abuses of this rule.
Round one will start with Mystery Guest X first. You may postulate a claim of your choice.
DING! Round One Starts!!!