Previous in Forum: Automatic transmission fluid compatibility   Next in Forum: The Chemistry of Soaps, Shampoos, and Laundry Detergents
Close
Close
Close
5 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Participant

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3

Limestone Consumption for Removal of Sulfur from coal

08/03/2008 1:38 AM

Dear All,

We have local coals here in the Philippines with heating values from 4, 500 Btu/lb to 5,200 Btu/lb with sulfur content 3.4%. We have another coal with heating value of 9,200 Btu/lb with 13% sulfur.

What is the ratio of limestone feed to these local coals in order to mitigate SO2 sulfur emission within standard level?

Regards.

T. L. Agtarap

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 588
Good Answers: 13
#1

Re: Limestone Consumption for Removal of Sulfur from coal

08/04/2008 12:13 AM

do a mass balance

Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#2

Re: Limestone Consumption for Removal of Sulfur from coal

08/04/2008 4:37 AM

Agreed. Mass balance.

Calcium Carbonate (limestone) → Calcium Oxide.

Calcium Oxide + Sulphur from the coal + a bit of oxygen from the air → Calcium Sulphate.

The rest is arithmetic, based upon the molecular weights of the above materials.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - Cardio-7

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 621
Good Answers: 10
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Limestone Consumption for Removal of Sulfur from coal

08/04/2008 12:55 PM

How do you prevent oxidation of the sulfur to produce some oxides of sulfur? One assumes this is not done in a closed system. The high sulfur content coal is awfully high in S.

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Retired Engineers / Mentors - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Brecksville, OH
Posts: 1621
Good Answers: 18
#4

Re: Limestone Consumption for Removal of Sulfur from coal

08/04/2008 9:15 PM

Regarding the high sulfur content coal. I agree. I worked in the coal research area for 18 years and never came across a coal with that high a sulfur level.

__________________
"Consensus Science got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?" : Rephrase of Will Rogers Comment
Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: michigan
Posts: 54
Good Answers: 1
#5

Re: Limestone Consumption for Removal of Sulfur from coal

08/07/2008 7:44 PM

A mass balance will tell you nothing! Now a mole balance will indeed tell you something. When dealing with reactions you look at molar quantities, not mass quantities.

Also one does not treat sulfur in the coal you treat its combustion byproduct. Coal is a very complex network of various molecules intertwined in one another. The sulfur in the coal is not elemental sulfur which the above equation suggests, sulfur in coal is in the form of sulfur compounds like thiophenes. The exact makeup of coal is indeterminent so a coal feedstock is typically characterized by an ultimate analysis which is based on the elements; carbon, hydrogen, sulfur, nitrogen, oxygen, and others (moisture and ash).

So given an elemental speciation and quantity of coal one can determine how much mass of each element is in the coal. From here this can be converted to molar quantities by dividing by the molecular weight of the component.

During combustion of coal, X moles of sulfur will be converted to X moles of sulfur dioxide (assume only SO2 is formed since negligible amounts of SO3 are formed as well).

So if the X moles exceeds standard emission levels in your area, you have to SCRUB the stack gas to remove excess sulfur dioxide below the standard. This can be accomplished with a limestone slurry (CaCO3 and water) flowing countercurrently (downward) to the stack gas in an absorption tower OR direct injection of wet or dry limestone into the furnace.

The conclusion is,

You would need at least X moles of limestone and 0.5X moles of water to accomplish the conversion of X moles of S (or SO2 however you look at it). Just convert moles back to mass quantities and you're set. The following is the underlying reaction:

CaCO3 + SO2 + 0.5H2O ---> CaSO3*(0.5H2O) + CO2

Note this is only part of the story since one needs to account for the heating value of coal used since the regulation is posted as grams of SO2 per higher heating value of fuel fed.

-David

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 5 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

agua_doc (1); Cardio07 (1); ChemE119 (1); PWSlack (1); vicini (1)

Previous in Forum: Automatic transmission fluid compatibility   Next in Forum: The Chemistry of Soaps, Shampoos, and Laundry Detergents

Advertisement