Previous in Forum: Earth Leakage Detection and Circuit Termination Units.   Next in Forum: Can Bare Cooper Busbar Surfaces Be Cleaned/Polished?
Close
Close
Close
17 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Participant

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4

Testing at High Temperatures

08/25/2008 4:12 PM

I am developing a circuit that is aimed to detect a change in temperature of about 500 degrees F. I ve found that thermocouples, RTDs and thermistors could detect this change in temperature. But I truly need a device that will with stand 3000 degrees F and be compitable with NI's Labview any suggestions are welcomed. Thank you.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Silvis, IL (Quad Cities)
Posts: 141
Good Answers: 5
#1

Re: Testing at High Temperatures

08/25/2008 7:51 PM

You are looking for a type B Thermocouple. it has a high range of over 3000 degrees Fahrenheit. If you are putting this in a medium you will want to get a thermocouple with some sort of ceramic coating on it to resist deterioration. I'm not familiar with Labview, but you can get a controller that will read the temperature and give out a 4-20mA signal, or pretty much any other signal that you need. Be advised, type B Thermocouples are expensive. We use type S Thermocouples in our application which has less rhodium than the type B and our thermocouple assemblies cost about 1200 USD.

__________________
Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing else to take away
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - Charter Member Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - Charter Member

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The People's Republic of Massachusetts
Posts: 1946
Good Answers: 73
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Testing at High Temperatures

08/25/2008 9:41 PM

Ya, Type B thermocouples are hugely expensive, (Pt 6% Rh vs Pt 30% Rh), and at 3000F at the very top of the range, not going to last very long.

Better bet is an optical sensor.

http://www.raytek.com/Raytek/en-r0/ProductsAndAccessories/InfraredPointSensors/ThermalertSeries/Default.htm

__________________
I go into every human encounter expecting to be framed for a crime I didn't commit. Dilbert, 2013
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Silvis, IL (Quad Cities)
Posts: 141
Good Answers: 5
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Testing at High Temperatures

08/25/2008 10:10 PM

That would work depending on what he's measuring. If he is measuring air temperature that would be pretty close to useless. Would be helpful if he told us what type of medium he is trying to measure.

__________________
Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing else to take away
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - Charter Member Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - Charter Member

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The People's Republic of Massachusetts
Posts: 1946
Good Answers: 73
#5
In reply to #3

Re: Testing at High Temperatures

08/26/2008 6:19 AM

Good points.

__________________
I go into every human encounter expecting to be framed for a crime I didn't commit. Dilbert, 2013
Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#4

Re: Testing at High Temperatures

08/26/2008 1:26 AM

A type R thermocouple may be a bit cheaper and will handle 3000F, I think we used Inconel metal sheath to protect the thermie from the process. Then a digital indicator or controller or even just a "thermocouple to mA converter" to give a handleable signal for Labview.

Rok

Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4
#6

Re: Testing at High Temperatures

08/26/2008 7:24 AM

Thank you for your suggestions. At this point I can only use K type thermocouples because of the system that we are using is a omega's cold junction compensationer and only K type thermocouples are compatiable. I am how ever measuring air temperature. I ve looked further into options to detect this drastic change in temperature and thought that a breakwire would melt at this point giving a signal to Labview of loss of continuity. This project is evenually going to be desgined to with stand the 3000 degrees but for now if I can caputure the moment this furnance has fire in it then my circuit would have done its job. If theres any details or other information any one needs just let me know. Again thank you

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Silvis, IL (Quad Cities)
Posts: 141
Good Answers: 5
#7
In reply to #6

Re: Testing at High Temperatures

08/26/2008 5:20 PM

If you are looking for fire, that's a horse of a different color. Get an ultraviolet flame sensor. Honeywell pretty much has a lock on the market for them. Just do a search for Purple Peeper. You get a controller to go with it, and this will have a relay that it can turn on when you have flame. If you aren't using it for a round the clock operation you would probably be best served by their mini peepers.

__________________
Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing else to take away
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - Charter Member Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - Charter Member

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The People's Republic of Massachusetts
Posts: 1946
Good Answers: 73
#8
In reply to #7

Re: Testing at High Temperatures

08/27/2008 7:23 AM

Very good idea. A mini-peeper, with a 7800 series controller, would do the trick. However, it should be pointed out that this setup will not read temperature, only indicate the presence of flame.

The mini-peeper is priced under $100, the 7800 series, with UV amp, is about $700.

www.honeywell.com

__________________
I go into every human encounter expecting to be framed for a crime I didn't commit. Dilbert, 2013
Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4
#9
In reply to #7

Re: Testing at High Temperatures

08/27/2008 7:29 AM

I am looking at the purple peeper now I hope it won't be a problem getting it ordered by the middle of september. Have any of you used it before, and if so what is the response time like?

Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - Charter Member Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - Charter Member

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The People's Republic of Massachusetts
Posts: 1946
Good Answers: 73
#10
In reply to #9

Re: Testing at High Temperatures

08/27/2008 8:18 AM

I have about 300 of these Honeywell controllers throughout the shop. They are used for flame safety and management. Their response to a flame signal is immediate.

There are many configurations of this product, so you should contact Honeywell sales to be sure you order the right units for your application.

In the US: 1-800-343-0228

You can look at the many configurations here:

https://estore.industrialcontrolsonline.com/default.aspx?page=category%20search%20results&CatList=0&parent=2&tree=2*Boiler+Burner+Controls*0@@

__________________
I go into every human encounter expecting to be framed for a crime I didn't commit. Dilbert, 2013
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Silvis, IL (Quad Cities)
Posts: 141
Good Answers: 5
#11
In reply to #9

Re: Testing at High Temperatures

08/27/2008 5:22 PM

Not sure if you are in the US or not. If you are, and the (I'm assuming here) furnace is over 150,000 BTU you are required to have a flame safety device on it. Refer to NFPA 86.

Also, I don't use mini peepers, I use the full version, the only real difference is that the full peeper has a shutter on it that verifies that the sensor is not saturated. If you use a mini peeper you would have to remove flame from the furnace I believe once every 24 hours to verify that the peeper is still working. Our Honeywell controllers have a 4 second timer on them, if it doesn't see flame for 4 seconds it will trip the safety latch valves.

__________________
Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing else to take away
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru
United States - Member - Charter Member Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - Charter Member

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The People's Republic of Massachusetts
Posts: 1946
Good Answers: 73
#12
In reply to #11

Re: Testing at High Temperatures

08/28/2008 7:07 AM

"If you use a mini peeper you would have to remove flame from the furnace I believe once every 24 hours to verify that the peeper is still working."

I have many of the mini-peepers, you don't ever have to remove the flame. I have furnaces that literally run for 6 mo. at a time, between Christmas and summer shutdowns. A very real difference is the full version costs 20 times more:

https://estore.industrialcontrolsonline.com/default.aspx?page=item%20detail&itemcode=C7012E1112

Due to tighter regulations these days, all new instillations require the full version.

__________________
I go into every human encounter expecting to be framed for a crime I didn't commit. Dilbert, 2013
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Silvis, IL (Quad Cities)
Posts: 141
Good Answers: 5
#14
In reply to #12

Re: Testing at High Temperatures

08/28/2008 10:07 PM

Aren't they pretty? I have almost 100 of that exact model where I work. So I know all about them.

Then they decided to install new furnaces. They used C7061 Peepers... which aren't compatible with the C7012E peepers... so now I have two different styles that if someone isn't paying attention can cause me to have to go to work in the middle of the night...

__________________
Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing else to take away
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
United States - Member - Charter Member Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - Charter Member

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The People's Republic of Massachusetts
Posts: 1946
Good Answers: 73
#15
In reply to #14

Re: Testing at High Temperatures

08/28/2008 11:04 PM

Oh man, I feel your your pain. We're doing a rehab on a 30 ft. rotary right now. I thought it was spec-ed out with the C7012E, first thing Tuesday morning, I gotta check out model numbers.

Soon they'll dump this furnace in my lap, " here, survey this to AMS2750D". A "new" instillation means a +-15F survey, 44 type N inco sheath tc's, at 1400F, 1700F, 1900F, 2100F, and 2200F. That means I live there for a month.

__________________
I go into every human encounter expecting to be framed for a crime I didn't commit. Dilbert, 2013
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Participant

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4
#13

Re: Testing at High Temperatures

08/28/2008 7:13 AM

Thank you gentle men for your immediate responses you have truly helped me out and yes I am in the USA.

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Silvis, IL (Quad Cities)
Posts: 141
Good Answers: 5
#16
In reply to #13

Re: Testing at High Temperatures

08/29/2008 5:41 AM

In that case I would recommend you get a copy of NFPA 86. It is better to know what is expected than to have OSHA come down on you like a ton of bricks. NFPA 86 is a list of standards for furnace safety systems. Also, alot of their standards make fairly good sense (with the exception of forbidding the use of standard PLCs in the safety systems. We had experts check and our PLC based controls are actually safer than hard wired.)

__________________
Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing else to take away
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#17

Re: Testing at High Temperatures

11/16/2018 5:02 AM

A "laser thermometer", being a non-contact measuring method, would seem to be a good direction to head towards.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 17 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); Bricktop (6); PWSlack (1); Shawn_V_Elect (6); tim bumbrey (3)

Previous in Forum: Earth Leakage Detection and Circuit Termination Units.   Next in Forum: Can Bare Cooper Busbar Surfaces Be Cleaned/Polished?

Advertisement