Previous in Forum: Prototype Tooling for a Foundry?   Next in Forum: balancing a roll
Close
Close
Close
6 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Participant

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1

Laser and plasma

09/12/2008 6:08 AM

I want to know

  • Which machine will be more efficient( Robotic Plasma cutting Vs Robotic Laser cutting ) in comparing cost , finish of product , usage ,maintenance and running cost .If iam going to use material thickness varying from 0.7 mm to 3mm Stainless steel.

We are planning to procure any one of above said. Our organization has sheet metal division ( plate thk vary from 0.7 mm to 3 mm ) .We are planning to use Robots laser/Precission Plasma cutters.Which system on procurement will be more efficient & beneficiary .If there any specialised Robots available with Horizantal reach of 2500 mm/Payload 20kg.

Please guide me..

Register to Reply
Pathfinder Tags: cutting Laser plasma robots
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Capital City, Cow Hampshire, USA
Posts: 476
Good Answers: 3
#1

Re: Laser and plasma

09/13/2008 7:05 AM

You might consider sending a few typical jobs out to some contract houses. Same part to both laser & plasma shop.

They have had time to optimise their process; this should give you a rough cost (amortised), plus an indication of the quality of finished piece-part.

__________________
If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you've always had!
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Power-User
United States - Member - US Navy Veteran

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Nothing sucks more than that moment during an argument when you realize you're wrong.
Posts: 301
Good Answers: 22
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Laser and plasma

09/13/2008 11:24 AM

GA

That's exactly what I'd suggest doing just after I gathered all the data I could and listen to all the sales pitch's from the selected vendors.

(learn faster and cheaper from observing someones elses "trial and error")

__________________
You never know when it will strike, but there comes a moment when you know that you just aren't going to do anything productive for the rest of the day.
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 6
#3

Re: Laser and plasma

09/14/2008 9:20 AM

Neither! Let me WaterJet the material! My waterjet costs are below anyones!

Waterjetting produces no heat affected zone....no discoloration and lasers are restricted by thickness and cannot cut reflected materials.

I'm in the Waterjet business and own an OMAX waterjet machine!

Dave

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Capital City, Cow Hampshire, USA
Posts: 476
Good Answers: 3
#5
In reply to #3

Re: Laser and plasma

09/16/2008 5:35 PM

How about AWJ maintainence costs?

We've contracted out a bunch of work, & were perpetually waiting for their machine to be repaired. It impacted our delivery schedule on several occasions.

__________________
If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you've always had!
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 6
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Laser and plasma

12/11/2008 3:45 PM

Hello Sidevalvequru!

The costs associated w/ AWJ are a function of two primary things...

1. The time

2. Composition of Materail

Regarding 'time' there are 3 sub categories to that ;

Namely, (a) the thickness of the material , (b) the 'configuration or (Geometry) and finally the (3) 'Finish" that you would request.

Generally most shops charge (and this is generally speaking.....anywhere from $100/hr to $200/hr.

Cost of material (if I buy it, is additional to that hourly rate!)

I'm in New Orleans, La.

Consider using my services!

thanks,

David

Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Brownsdale, MN
Posts: 8
#4

Re: Laser and plasma

09/16/2008 1:09 PM

I would agree with the water jet option. Hi-Def plasma would work but the smoke is tough to deal with and the heat affected zone might require further finishing.

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 6 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

JLK (2); markar (1); sidevalveguru (2); tlewis (1)

Previous in Forum: Prototype Tooling for a Foundry?   Next in Forum: balancing a roll

Advertisement