Previous in Forum: Designing Load Bearings   Next in Forum: Heat Exchanger Configuration - Estimate Energy Savings
Close
Close
Close
3 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Power-User

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: India
Posts: 111

Tappings for Temperature and Pressure Connections

11/21/2008 4:49 AM

Tappings for Temperature / Pressure connections should be same as that of associated piping class or can be higher than connected piping . Pl. clear the misconception.

Thanks

sachin

__________________
Be simple and specific for a great success in Life
Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Guru
Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - Retired Piper

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bayonet Point, Florida
Posts: 635
Good Answers: 61
#1

Re: Pr & Temp. tapping

11/21/2008 12:17 PM

There is no justification for making them a higher pipe class and it is just adding cost.

They should be the same line class as everything else in the line.

__________________
Do it once and do it right
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hop around Toronto, New York & Karachi
Posts: 1876
Good Answers: 19
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Pr & Temp. tapping

11/21/2008 11:44 PM

Agreed.

__________________
I not only use all the brains that I have, but all that I can borrow. Woodrow Wilson
Register to Reply
2
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 378
Good Answers: 24
#3

Re: Tappings for Temperature and Pressure Connections

11/22/2008 12:51 PM

It depends on the service and size. For example, refineries and petrochemical plants have many very large pipes, both low pressure and very high pressure, and temperatures approaching 1800F.

It is almost universal practice that any connection (such as pressure taps) that is smaller than 2" be the greater of the Piping Class of the piping or 2000# class. There is also a general specification of minimum 3/4" class connection to process, gas and steam lines and that be no less than 2000# class weld-o-let with 2000# socket-weld block valve and socket-weld 2000# nipple with external threads for the connection.

While this may seem excessive, sad experience of very costly fires and loss of life have resulted from sudden failure of small connections on process piping. I personally witnessed such a tragedy at very close range when a female thread 3/4" block valve blew off when closed and a solid bull plug was screwed in the outlet and tightened. This released an essentially unlimited quantity of oil at 350 psig and over 650 F. The valve was a 'water drain' for start-up. Post incident investigation revealed it had at some time suffered severe corrosion of the internal threads-which, could not have been seen unless it was removed. The two people performing the work were immediately burned to death when the hot oil auto-ignited instantly on contact with air.

The only reason the fire caused only $30 Million in property damage was the heat weakened a pipe hanger above it in less than 2 minutes, causing a 42" cooling water main to sag and rupture-dumping over 100,000 GPM on the fire and extinguishing it in about 5 seconds. (The cooling tower basins emptied in about 2 min.)

The Company required immediate (on a 24/7 basis) identification and good visual inspection, of all similar valves throughout its worldwide installations and replacement at first opportunity. Several similar condition valves were found, 4 of which exhibited trace leakage and on unit shutdown for emergency maintenance, could be knocked off the pipe with single hammer blows. Screwed threads were forbidden in flammable or hazardous liquid or gas service from then on and retrofitting was accomplished at the next opportunity. Tubing connections were allowed only if there were at least two independently accessible block valves ahead of the first tubing fitting.

In summary, small connections are more dangerous than large connections because corrosion can more easily weaken them and mechanical impact (from dropped equipment etc.) can more easily cause an uncontrolled release. As always, the 'devil is in the details' .

__________________
Keith E Bowers, PMP
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Register to Reply 3 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

ducon (1); Keith E Bowers (1); PennPiper (1)

Previous in Forum: Designing Load Bearings   Next in Forum: Heat Exchanger Configuration - Estimate Energy Savings

Advertisement