Previous in Forum: over head tank foundation   Next in Forum: Old School Concrete Terms
Close
Close
Close
2 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Participant

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2

Bearing Capacity from Hand Penetrometer Test

12/02/2008 7:13 AM

Hand penetrometer is the test from which we can obtain bearing capacity of the soil with in short time.

can u tell me how the bearing capacity is evalauated from hand penetrometer N values.

the obtained bearing capacity is either gross or net.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Anonymous Poster
#1

Re: Bearing Capacity from Hand Penetrometer Test

12/02/2008 5:11 PM

Hand penetrometers are a very gross test method. I would not recommend it for any test where an accurate bearing capacity was required, or any structure was to be built based on the data. Hand penetrometers are highly variable, inaccurate and susceptible to influence from the operator. No two operators apply the same pressures or action times consistently throughout the testing. Nor do they apply the same pressure through out the duration of one test or across multiple tests. Plus hand penetrometers have very limited operating ranges. Nothing tested would give you comparable accuracy or precision as you might see with a CPT or SPT.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4513
Good Answers: 88
#2

Re: Bearing Capacity from Hand Penetrometer Test

12/06/2008 8:57 AM

Penetrometers are indeed a gross test method which produce inconsistent results for the reasons Guest cited, and this becomes readily apparent in the hands of an inexperienced operator. Needless to say, penetrometers remain the most popular of the methods used. Veterans of the technique know to apply pressure in a sinusoidal scheme having a period of around 2 Hz, with an amplitude roughly proportional to the compaction of the test material. Superior results are obtained by allowing at least 20 minutes for each test, with plenty of time between tests to mitigate operator fatigue and to avoid placing excessive stress on the instrument. Consistently following these guidelines will ensure repeatable, accurate results and years of service.

Recent advances in penetrometer technology have resulted in the development of competing methods, including this one. However, the stock penetrometer continues to remain the most popular tool in the operator's arsenal because it is a mature, "tried-and-true" technology that's easy to use even by the most inexperienced journeyman.

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 2 comments

Previous in Forum: over head tank foundation   Next in Forum: Old School Concrete Terms

Advertisement