Previous in Forum: Emissions Test Failure - '98 Chevy PU   Next in Forum: Car Batteries and Concrete Floors
Close
Close
Close
7 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Power-User

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 142

Fuel & Power Station - Generate electricity & biofuel in one plant

12/10/2008 10:56 AM

Background: Modern gas turbine based power stations increase their overall efficiency (~30%) by recovering exhaust heat to run a second stage generator using a steam turbine. These are known as combined cycle gas turbines (CCGT).

My suggestion is, rather than use GT exhaust heat to make additional electricity, would it not be more profitable and ecological to run a biomass pyrolyzier with said heat. A gas turbine can generate exhaust temperatures up to 590°C & pyrolysis of biomass can occur at just below this temperature.

This statement supports my idea: "In a process known as fast pyrolysis, fine, low-moisture biomass fuel particles are heated rapidly to temperatures in the range of 450° to 550° C (842° to 1022° F), resulting in liquid pyrolysis oil but very little gas. The oil produced in fast pyrolysis is 60 percent to 75 percent of the original fuel mass. It can be used as a synthetic fuel oil."

It may seem inefficient to use some energy from one fuel to make another, but it is a question of sustainability. Gaseous fuels are excellent for fixed delivery infrastructures like our 'town' natural gas networks. Liquid fuels are better suited to vehicles where fuel is transported with the power generator (i.e. 'on-board' engines).

I would envisage a scenario utilising biomass from farming cooperative. With the farms collectively generating hundreds of tonnes of agricultural wastes annually, a partnership could be formed with an electricity company in commissioning a GT power station (centrally located between the farms) The GT exhaust gases would be channelled into a pyrolysis plant and liquid fuels would be sold in local towns.

Advantages: It would give boost to farming communities whilst generating low carbon fuels for the surrounding communities (cutting fuel transport impacts). Liquid transport fuels can be made from many 'waste' biological feedstock, such as forestry or wood-mill residues. The magic ingredient needed to drive this transformation is heat.

Disadvantages: Not initially carbon neutral due to use of natural gas. I have considered, once the system is up and running a biomass gasifier could take the place of the NG supply.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Commentator
Hobbies - Fishing - New Member but not a new fisherman Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Formerly from NJ USA Planet Earth. Relocated to Space Coast FL
Posts: 79
Good Answers: 9
#1

Re: Fuel & Power Station - Generate electricity & biofuel in one plant

12/11/2008 12:34 AM

Sheps,

Sounds good to me. I'm employed in a small (15 Meg) 3 GT dual fuel CC cogen. We mostly fire on NG but have the option of using ultra low sulfur diesel when NG is not available. We use our waste heat to supply a 370 F hot water loop that is 6 miles or so in length. We also have the option of using duct burners to increase the turbine exhaust heat if we need more BTU's going into the heat recovery. The heat is utilized to heat buildings and research areas such as greenhouses. The high temp hot water is also used to generate steam via heat exchangers and is used for many purposes. I have often wondered if it would be feasible to have heating coils in place when we are constructing (for lack of a better term) landfills. Then when the landfill reaches a certain height we could turn on the heat and "cook" the methane out at a much faster rate. We could also investigate if if would make economic sense to retrofit existing mature landfills. Sewage plant sludge is another possible feed stock for methane production. In my area we have many methane recovery operations and some of them inject oxygen to increase methane production. The gas could then be filtered and scrubbed of CO2 and used to fuel the combustion turbines ( as could the pyrolysis oil in your senario) to generate more power or sold to one of the utility companies. Power and natural gas demand is seasonal in my area. Decisions would need to be made as to when to burn or sell the methane based on economics. All in all I like your idea. We need more out of the box ideas and solutions if we want to sustain our present lifestyle in a more eco friendly manner. Ed

__________________
If you understand no explaination is necessary. If you don't understand no explaination is possible.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 142
#4
In reply to #1

Re: Fuel & Power Station - Generate electricity & biofuel in one plant

12/11/2008 10:57 AM

Your point about seasonal availability of NG in some industies could also impact on thiis design, especially with the option to fire on Diesel. Economically it could be worth firing on Biofuel at times of higher NG cost.

370F sounds a bit low for efficient pyrolysis, but as you say the exhaust temps could be boosted. There may still be enough residual heat left after the pyrolysis stage for local hot water & raising steam.

I like the landfill idea: Maybe an on-site solar furnace could be used for your landfill 'cooking'.

Register to Reply
Commentator
Hobbies - Fishing - New Member but not a new fisherman Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Formerly from NJ USA Planet Earth. Relocated to Space Coast FL
Posts: 79
Good Answers: 9
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Fuel & Power Station - Generate electricity & biofuel in one plant

12/12/2008 12:19 AM

The typical range of my combustion turbine exhaust gas temperatures (into the hi temp heat recovery units) are from 800F without the duct burners to 1250F or so with them on. The hi temp shut down setpoint is 1450F so there is a lot of room here to make changes. The heat recovery units could be using oil instead of water to transfer the heat as is often done in oil refineries.This would allow much higher temps without the need for really high pressures as is the case in hi temp hot water or steam systems. You would also have the option of impounding this oil in insulated storage tanks for other uses. Internal pipe, tank and heat exchanger corrosion would be virtually zero because or no entrained oxygen in the system. You would also save money on chemicals for feed water treatment and condensate recovery equipment. The typical efficiencies of combustion turbines like mine are around 30%. There are some much larger units out there that use some of the exhaust heat to preheat the air before the combustor. These guys claim to have efficiencies in the 60% range so it is possible to nearly double our electric production. I am not sure of how large an impact that these higher temps would have on turbine life but it would most likely shorten it. One limiting factor to running these units really hot is the production of higher NOx levels. We use a wet system ( deionized water injection into the combustor) to keep our flame front temperatures at 1250F. There are better systems out there. It is with out a doubt that we need better more integrated systems to squeeze out every possible BTU from the fuels we use and to lessen our environmental impact. You mentioned solar furnaces. I read about a peaking plant in the southwest (CA I think) that uses a mirror array to focus solar heat on a large oil filled recovery unit. We need more of this type of plant to eliminate brownouts and service interruptions. Ed

__________________
If you understand no explaination is necessary. If you don't understand no explaination is possible.
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Power-User

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: United States of America
Posts: 429
Good Answers: 3
#7
In reply to #5

Re: Fuel & Power Station - Generate electricity & biofuel in one plant

01/26/2009 11:42 AM

Regarding your suggestion of using exhaust heat to drive out methane from landfills, I was curious if such pyrolysis did not require dry heat conditions? The reasoning is that with a landfill, there just might be the issue of soil-water/humidity as a result of the water flowing from the surrounding into the landfill.

__________________
EditorGBAnalysts - Give a boy fish and he will eat may be for a day, but teach him how to fish and he will eat everyday.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: United States of America
Posts: 429
Good Answers: 3
#2

Re: Fuel & Power Station - Generate electricity & biofuel in one plant

12/11/2008 5:46 AM

If the power generator is to be built from scratch then then I would think that it would be more cost-effective to start-off with the biomass gasifiers at once, instead of incurring the additional capital expense of an NG burner. then calculate the cost advantage relative to the prevailing system.

__________________
EditorGBAnalysts - Give a boy fish and he will eat may be for a day, but teach him how to fish and he will eat everyday.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 142
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Fuel & Power Station - Generate electricity & biofuel in one plant

12/11/2008 10:49 AM

Hi.

Yes, this type of development may only make economic sense when retrofitted.

That said, my inspiration came from the belief that natural gas via pipeline is wonderful for stationary power sources, whereas liquid fuels can be better used on 'the move'.

We have petrol giants like BP trying to re-sell us Gas-to-Liquid technology as a 'green' solution (a pre-WWII concept). I much prefer some system that can give us bio-fuels on an economically viable scale, whilst using tryed & tested GT equipment on the 'front-end'.

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: United States of America
Posts: 429
Good Answers: 3
#6
In reply to #3

Re: Fuel & Power Station - Generate electricity & biofuel in one plant

01/23/2009 12:05 PM

I had been thinking, although from the stand point of sustainability the recovery of the energy contents of biomass would be advantageous, I think that the capital cost which would be required for implementation versus the continued used of an existing secondary heat recovery system would argue against the idea every time.

However, several farmers are beginning to install at their expense, individual "wood-burners" which actually are of the form of Biomass Gasifier you have in mind. perhaps a better way would be to sell the exhaust gas and have the gas distributed to the various farmers for use in their own Biomass Gasifiers. This would enable the Utility company to still make money from the farmers, support the sustainability programs, and reduce the operations and related overheads. this approach just might be a win win situation.

Just a thought.

__________________
EditorGBAnalysts - Give a boy fish and he will eat may be for a day, but teach him how to fish and he will eat everyday.
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 7 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

ed fuzzyE kedz (2); editorgbanalysts (3); Sheps (2)

Previous in Forum: Emissions Test Failure - '98 Chevy PU   Next in Forum: Car Batteries and Concrete Floors

Advertisement