Update on creation of the universe.

There are several theories concerning creation. It is set out in the first paper and repeated in the last paper that there are two question. The first rests on 'could it have been like this?' The other question is 'was it this?'

Without an eye witness with a ship load of instruments at the creating event, theories merely ask and answer the first question, putting forward theoretically plausible explanations concerning 'the how it could have been'.

My five papers put together a possible scenario that not only provides a twist on one of the theories but also produces a modification of it.

Since the 'was it' question cannot be answered, there exists no understanding at all of the actual event(s) creating the universe, not even a limited understanding. All there is available is a group of theories based on a hot creating event, as a result of the presence of the microwave background at 2.7 K. There is no indication which one is correct or whether they are all a load of rubbish because the universe never followed any of those paths and therefore, everyone has got it wrong..