Previous in Forum: Dynamic Characteristic of AVR   Next in Forum: Protection Class CT's
Close
Close
Close
4 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Anonymous Poster

AC motor nameplate markings vs Actual test

04/29/2009 11:48 AM

I have a 3hp, 400 VAC, 50 HZ, 3 ph, 1.15 SF motor with the nameplate Full Load Amps of 4.8.The namufacturer ran IEEE 112, Method B tests. Data at 100% of load indcates 5.2 amps. MG-1, 12.47, indicates that input amps can vary by 10% of nameplate value. How is the nameplate value determined and is the higher value a concern?

Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#1

Re: AC motor nameplate markings vs Actual test

04/29/2009 3:25 PM

Your motor has a service factor of 1.15, which means that it can operate at up to 5.52 amps without damage.

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#2
In reply to #1

Re: AC motor nameplate markings vs Actual test

04/29/2009 4:52 PM

When motor is running, it drives a fan. The current reading is 5.8 amps when air density is high. Does running at the higher amperage damage the motor?

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#3
In reply to #2

Re: AC motor nameplate markings vs Actual test

04/29/2009 5:03 PM

That's hard to answer. It depends on the brand of motor and the actual amount of headroom designed into the windings. My gut reaction is it will shorten the life of the motor, but not by much. If it's been in service for some time and hasn't died yet, give it a go.

Not to plug a certain motor, but Baldors are better at tolerating some overloading than most others.

Reply
2
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California, USA, where the Godless live next door to God.
Posts: 4665
Good Answers: 804
#4

Re: AC motor nameplate markings vs Actual test

04/29/2009 7:50 PM

The "official" definition of Service Factor is NEMA publications says something to the effect that SF is an amount of additional output power the motor can deliver for a short time (not defined), but at which other stated performance date will not be accurate. it also goes on to say that expected motor life will be diminished.

But those are guidelines, there is no hard and fast rule for what that 1.15SF really means, othr than the fact that if the motor is run in the SF, the amps will be higher. So every motor design will be different, but it's a given that you will increase the motor winding temperature. The one real rule is that for every 10 deg. C you raise the motor winding temperature above its rating, you cut the expected motor life in half. So if for instance your motor has a winding insulation temperature rating of 155C, and because you run it into the SF continuously, the windings get to 165C, you have shortened the motor life to 1/2 of what it should have been.

__________________
** All I every really wanted to be, was... A LUMBERJACK!.**
Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Reply to Forum Thread 4 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); JRaef (1); lyn (2)

Previous in Forum: Dynamic Characteristic of AVR   Next in Forum: Protection Class CT's
You might be interested in: Label and Nameplate Services, Pushbutton Switches

Advertisement