Previous in Forum: Engineering Mechanics   Next in Forum: Threaded Inserts for Small Sailboat Restoration
Close
Close
Close
3 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Anonymous Poster

MAP vs. MAWP

05/28/2009 8:33 AM

Good Evening to All according to my point of view MAWP-It Is the maximum allowable pressure for given design temperature at top of vessel in normal operating condition i would like to clear my doubt that will i use nominal thikness while calculating MAWP or nomonal thikness less corrosion allowance????? tell me wat abt MAP

Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#1

Re: Differene b/w MAP & MAWP

05/28/2009 9:24 AM

Always use nominal thickness less corrosion allowance. The vessel still needs to be safe at the design pressure, at the end of its economic life.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Reply
Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7
#3
In reply to #1

Re: Differene b/w MAP & MAWP

05/29/2009 12:27 AM

thank you for reply.... what about MAP calculation shall we use nomonal thiknessk less corrosion allowance while calculating MAP?????

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#2

Re: MAP vs. MAWP

05/28/2009 2:35 PM

Search this site for extensive previous discussions.

Reply
Reply to Forum Thread 3 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); PWSlack (1); sandeeppandey0789 (1)

Previous in Forum: Engineering Mechanics   Next in Forum: Threaded Inserts for Small Sailboat Restoration

Advertisement