Previous in Forum: Contactors   Next in Forum: 220V/60Hz vs 250V/50Hz
Close
Close
Close
6 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Active Contributor

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 16

Normal MCCBs vs. Current-Limiting MCCBs

07/06/2009 12:11 PM

Any body can explain differnce between the normal type & Current limiting type MCCB's. What are the application & disadvantage of both models.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Commentator

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: S.E. Asia
Posts: 91
Good Answers: 1
#1

Re: Comparison of Normal Type & current limiting type MCCB

07/06/2009 12:27 PM

Current Limiting circuit breakers (& current limiting MCCB's) operate much quicker than the normal type CB's/MCCB's under short circuit conditions, thus limiting the amount of "let through energy" (I²t). They are therefore more expensive than "normal" circuit breakers.

Is this a homework question?

__________________
"If you try to keep a leg each side of a barbed-wire fence, you'll do yourself a mischief." - Joh Bjelke-Petersen.
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1604
Good Answers: 63
#2

Re: Comparison of Normal Type & current limiting type MCCB

07/06/2009 12:29 PM
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California, USA, where the Godless live next door to God.
Posts: 4665
Good Answers: 804
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Comparison of Normal Type & current limiting type MCCB

07/06/2009 2:22 PM

Interesting brochure from ABB, but it is essentially just a bunch of advertising drivel. They make no real explanation of WHAT is different about a CL breaker, only a vague and short reference to what actually happens inside. That's because the truth is, it is NOT "rocket science", it is just magnetics.

The current carrying components are arranged so that the current flowing through the stationary contacts must make a u-turn (horse shoe) before making contact with the moveable element. This creates a magnetic force surrounding the horse show shape, which is the same polarity of the magnetic force coming from the movable contact arm. As we know, magnetic forces of the same olarity repel each other. In general, the forces are relatively low when current is normal, but when a short circuit happens, the forces increase exponentially. So the higher the amount of current passing through the breaker, the HARDER the contacts will try to separate. Once the trip mechanism releases them then, the FASTER they open and interrupt the current flow. The faster the current flow can be interrupted, the lower the "let-through" current will be.

This technology was discovered and patented by the old Klockner Moeller company in the '60s and their patents ran out in the late '70s, at which time Westinghouse released their version, followed shortly thereafter by everyone else. Ironically, Westinghouse was bought by Eaton / Cutler Hammer, whpo now has purchased what was left of Klockner Moeller.

__________________
** All I every really wanted to be, was... A LUMBERJACK!.**
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mallorca, Spain
Posts: 567
Good Answers: 15
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Comparison of Normal Type & current limiting type MCCB

07/07/2009 10:18 AM

Hi JRaef,

Can you elaborate on the explanation provided, or do you have a site where a good explanation with diagrams exist?

thanks for your always consise answers

regards

Chas

__________________
En la casa del herrero, cuchillos de palo!
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California, USA, where the Godless live next door to God.
Posts: 4665
Good Answers: 804
#6
In reply to #4

Re: Comparison of Normal Type & current limiting type MCCB

07/08/2009 12:19 AM

Unfortunately, everything I learned about this predated the digital age...

Moeller or Cutler Hammer may still have some white papers on it, but the concept is now so old that it may be too passe for someone to have made a digital version or scanned an old paper to make it available.

__________________
** All I every really wanted to be, was... A LUMBERJACK!.**
Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1
#5

Re: Normal MCCBs vs. Current-Limiting MCCBs

07/07/2009 10:40 PM

Standard CB operated by the force from springs normally cannot separate fast enough to extinguish the arc before the fault current passed thru its 1st instantaneous peak value at half a cycle, this kind of CB is therefore unable to provide current limitation when clearing a fault & thus unable to limit the 'let thru' energy.

1 method of CL CB is Manufacturers' use the slot motor principle. On extreme large fault current, the large current thru the 2 contact arms creates a tremendous repulsion force that cause the contacts to open apart extremely fast (normally < 0.01s). Thus limit the peak current into the protected circuit.

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 6 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

capblanc (1); elkangorito (1); JRaef (2); wareagle (1); WING66 (1)

Previous in Forum: Contactors   Next in Forum: 220V/60Hz vs 250V/50Hz

Advertisement