Previous in Forum: spure gear tooth lowest and highest points of contact   Next in Forum: ASTM 139 Grade B
Close
Close
Close
5 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Associate

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 46

NDT % vs. Joint Efficiency - ASME B.31.1

07/29/2009 9:38 AM

The Question is How we can determinate the % of NDT for welds when the Factor E is different than 1 (Full NDT according with Table 136.4 ASME B31.1). But for Random per example with E 0.85, whats the % to be used, 10%, 20%,15%..........????

What is the way to determinate the minimun random????

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Power-User

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Africa - Centurion.
Posts: 280
Good Answers: 3
#1

Re: NDT % Vs Joint efficience ASME B.31.1

07/29/2009 11:01 AM

I would also like to know.

... however being in the NDT field myself, I think it is a combination of the following:

the welding repair rate of the company that do the welding work,

the insecurity of the inspector requesting the welds that needs NDT,

the amount of money that can be spent on NDT,

the end users needs.

If you are ever able to fully understand a specification, it will be a joy working to it, but most of us are left in the dark and sometimes uncertain on what to actually do.

__________________
Dreams are the blue print for reality.
Register to Reply
Guru
Spain - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Nuclear Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 716
Good Answers: 25
#2

Re: NDT % vs. Joint Efficiency - ASME B.31.1

07/30/2009 8:35 AM

Hi friends,

AFAIK, B31.1 requires in paragraph 102.4.3 a "Weld Joint Efficiency Factor" (E) which must account in the calculations. E factors depending on weld type are given in Table 102.4.3.

Paragraph 136.4 send you to Table 136.4 for the extent and type of NDE according to weld type (longitudinal, branch, fillet...) having into account that applies only to "pressure welds or welds to pressure retaining components".

Nor paragraph nor table 136.4 make differences on "E".

Any other weld not included in Table 136.4, must be just visually inspected as per paragraph 136.4

Kind regards

__________________
It's stupid to discuss about AI: We´ve reached by the "B" way. We' ve producing men as clever as machines.
Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 46
#4
In reply to #2

Re: NDT % vs. Joint Efficiency - ASME B.31.1

07/31/2009 3:52 AM

Yes, is O'right. But how to define the Random %. What's the meaning of .85 or .60, or .75. Is there an specific value for each E and the NDT% ????

Thanks for your attention

Register to Reply
Guru
Spain - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Nuclear Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 716
Good Answers: 25
#5
In reply to #4

Re: NDT % vs. Joint Efficiency - ASME B.31.1

08/01/2009 8:20 AM

Hello,

There's no random %. The only applicable Table is that 136.4

The factor "E" .85, .60 etc. is just for design, as for example for determining the minimum wall thickness in straight pipe:

As you can see, for identical conditions, the lesser the "E" value, the greater the thickness you get. But once you've got your thickness, just apply 136.4.

Kind regards

__________________
It's stupid to discuss about AI: We´ve reached by the "B" way. We' ve producing men as clever as machines.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Northeast corner of the sphere
Posts: 310
Good Answers: 7
#3

Re: NDT % vs. Joint Efficiency - ASME B.31.1

07/30/2009 8:48 AM

Not having the spec in front of me, the implication at .85 would be either 85% or 15%. If this is to be a coded vessel, than I would contact my local AIs and ask what they would expect to see.

My very general rule of thumb would be to inspect all welds 100% Magnetic Particle 72 hours after welding or while still accessible and ultrasonic critical / high stress welds 2 angles after 72 hours. This is done at the time of manufacture and will not necessarily be done again. If the material is not self stress relieving like T-1, then inspect as soon as possible after welding. Pay close attention to surface discontinuities as these will cause you the most grief.

If you are out in the field doing the inspection for someone else, it is usually their responsibility to determine the amount and location of the sample(s). If this responsibility has been foisted-off on you, then do a visual scan first and concentrate on welds in areas that look the most worn or 'beat'.

__________________
How can you be two places at once when you're actually nowhere at all?
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 5 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

atorroja (1); Jerry New Hampshire (1); Kwetz (2); Quobaldt (1)

Previous in Forum: spure gear tooth lowest and highest points of contact   Next in Forum: ASTM 139 Grade B

Advertisement