Folks, is it true in its entirety that crosshead is only design for double acting? Can't single acting reciprocating compressor be incoporated with crosshead?
For double acting you compress on the return stroke and you have to seal the piston rod. This is difficult or near impossible if the rod is flexing. This is reason for the crosshead to make the movement stable for the seal. No other reason that I am aware of.
__________________
The fine line between cuddling and holding one down to prevent escape must be learned
ROY,i am grateful for your short but self explanatory answer couple with the elaboratory answers of the PROF i am more than satisfied,once again thanks alot
Roy is correct in what he says, but there are more reasons for using a crosshead, and yes, some single acting reciprocating compressors use a crosshead design. Some reasons, sure other people will add (or subtract):
Length of stroke can be greater
lower side thrusts of the piston to cylinder wall are achieved so nearly all ringless, non-lubricated etc designs use them
Distance piece can be long for non-lubricated design
Sealing of crank lube oil from cylinder is possible
for flammable and or hazardous gases the piston leakage can be sealed at the piston rod packing
Separate extra distance piece is possible
__________________
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (A.E.)
I feel covered and protected whenever i am in my professional circle,you guys have tremendously for me,the grey area i have has been clear,thanks for been a partner in progress
"Almost" Good Answers: