Previous in Forum: Power Plant   Next in Forum: Calculating Impact Force
Close
Close
Close
3 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Commentator

Join Date: May 2009
Location: UAE
Posts: 80
Good Answers: 3

Differential Thermal Expansion of Fixed Tube Sheet Exchanger

08/03/2009 12:35 PM

I have rectangular fixed tube sheet heat exchanger to design. I have operating temperature on tube sides and shell sides as 180 & 160 degree centigrade . Operating medium on tube side is steam & acquous lithium bromide on shell side. The design pressures on tube side & shell side are 10 bar & FV respectively. The MOC of tubes and shells are SA516 gR 70 & that of tubes is SS430 Ti.Since the tube expands more than shell the tube will be under compression and shell will be under compression. it means shell actually pulls tube sheet adding some moment. Can any tell me how to find that whether tube sheet is safe or not under the case of differential thermal expansion case?

__________________
RK
Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
Popular Science - Evolution - New Member

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: India-Chennai.
Posts: 722
Good Answers: 30
#1

Re: Differential Thermal Expansion of Fixed Tube Sheet Exchanger

08/04/2009 12:47 AM

Tubes are subjected to 180/160 degree Centigrade and Shell is subjected to 160/ambient temperature. Even if they are of same material, there will be differential expansion. This will spell on the tube joints at tube sheet.

Is there 'expansion bellow' on the shell? Watching the dimensions of this bellow will give a very good tell-tale, if there a substantial differential expansion.

__________________
A picture worth thousand words: needless to say if it is animated.
Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: May 2009
Location: UAE
Posts: 80
Good Answers: 3
#3
In reply to #1

Re: Differential Thermal Expansion of Fixed Tube Sheet Exchanger

08/05/2009 12:32 PM

Dear yesyen,

There are no expansion bellows to take care of expansion and the tube joints are safe .

What exactly i am looking for is : This is rectangular tube sheet and there pressure acting on tube side for which I have calculated the thickness of tube sheet as per design code AD2000 MERKBLATT. I want to find the additional thickness required for tube sheet to with stand the pull of shell.

Regards,

__________________
RK
Register to Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#2

Re: Differential Thermal Expansion of Fixed Tube Sheet Exchanger

08/04/2009 12:55 AM

I suspect that I am asking more questions than giving answers, but here are some items to consider:

In the US, this design would fall under TEMA (Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers' Association) and/or ASME criteria. Thus, check both codes. If the tubes are expansion-rolled into grooved holes in the tube sheets, this rigid assembly would be subjected to the differential expansion forces you mention. On the other hand, I understand there may be some elastomeric joint designs (e.g., the tubes pass through silicone O-rings in the tube-sheet grooves?) that could avoid the problem of differential expansion. But then the unsupported tube sheet will need to be thick enough to withstand the pressure on the steam side.

This is only as I can understand without a drawing. The mention of aqueous LiBr suggests that this is an absorption-type chiller, such as for air conditioning. Best of luck and success with your project.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Register to Reply 3 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

brkmech (1); Tornado (1); yesyen (1)

Previous in Forum: Power Plant   Next in Forum: Calculating Impact Force

Advertisement